Posted on 05/26/2022 9:42:58 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Kissinger, never one to let a crisis got to waste, has been busy on an important new-world-order project in Russia with Vladimir Putin. Although it has gone virtually unreported in the U.S. media, Kissinger has been featured prominently in the Russian media during his many trips over the past decade to Moscow to meet with Putin and Yevgeny Primakov, the former KGB terror master for the Soviet Union in the Middle East. In 2007, Kissinger and Primakov were appointed by Putin to co-chair a bilateral "working group" of Russian and American political insiders to tackle issues such as global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and nuclear threats.
Novosti, the Russian "news" agency run by Putin-friendly apparatchiks, reported on the new working group in an April 26, 2007 story, noting that "Kissinger, U.S. secretary of state from 1973 to 1977, has been a frequent guest in Russia since Putin took office in 2000."
A Novosti story on July 13, 2007 reported on Kissinger’s "closed door" meeting with Putin, Primakov, and a delegation of former U.S. officials at Putin’s presidential residence. The Novosti article, along with multiple photos of the event, contrasted sharply with the absence of any coverage of the conference by the major U.S. media, which should have been on top of such a meeting of world leaders and should have let the American public know about it. Accompanying Kissinger were: former Secretary of State George Shultz; former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin; former Special Representative for Arms Control, Nonproliferation and Disarmament Ambassador Thomas Graham, Jr.; former Senator Sam Nunn; and Chevron Chairman and Chief Executive Officer David O’Reilly. All of the Kissinger-led U.S. team, save for O’Reilly, are high-level members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), lending credence to the belief that this is actually a project of the CFR, the premier organization pushing for a new world order for much of the past century.
Like Kissinger, the CFR and its publication Foreign Affairs also refer explicitly to a "new world order"; for a couple of examples, click here and here.
In December, Kissinger was back in Russia meeting with President Dmitry Medvedev, Putin’s protégé. Again, no coverage in the U.S. media, though the Russian press considered it newsworthy. Russia Today, a Novosti subsidiary, reported: "While waiting for the Russian president, Henry Kissinger had been chatting with Evgeny Primakov, Russia’s former foreign minister." Primakov now heads the Russian Chamber of Commerce, a post that experienced intelligence analysts see as the perfect cover to continue his intelligence functions for the KGB-FSB during his numerous trips to abroad, especially to the Middle East, where he meets with leaders of many of the terror regimes he supported in the Soviet era.
Kissinger and his fellow globalists at the Council on Foreign Relations never seem to be discomfited working with the leaders of totalitarian regimes. Indeed, they seem to have the most cordial of relations with one another. They do not seem to be concerned that the Putin-Medvedev regime has been brutally suppressing all dissent and opposition — and killing those who refuse to yield to the suppression. Even "mainstream" media like the BBC have noted that under Putin, the KGB’s power and influence have increased to unprecedented heights.
In an article entitled, "KGB influence ‘soars under Putin’" the BBC reported:
Four out of five political leaders and state administrators in Russia either have been or still are members of the security services, a study suggests.
The unprecedented research implies a huge expansion of KGB-FSB influence in politics and business in recent years.
Many of the officials concerned have been appointed under President Vladimir Putin — himself a former spy chief….
Among the presidential administration, members of the government, deputies of both chambers of parliament, regional heads, as well as the boards of Russia’s top state corporations, four in five officials worked for the KGB, or continue to work for one or more of its successor organizations.
Readers of The New American are not surprised by this, as we have been reporting on the continuation of the Soviet communist program under the supposed "reform" government of Russia over the past two decades. However, to Kissinger and the new-world-order cheerleaders at the Council on Foreign Relations, Putin’s "democratic deficit" (or Hu Jintao’s in China) is a triviality that should not be allowed to stand in the way of East-West "convergence," with the final goal being world government under an expanded and fully empowered United Nations.
The convergence strategy was, perhaps, most nakedly explained by Ford Foundation President H. Rowan Gaither (a Council on Foreign Relations member), who admitted to congressional investigator Norman Dodd in 1953 that he and others inside and outside of government were working "to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union." (See William H. McIlhany, The Tax-Exempt Foundations (Arlington House, 1980), pp. 60-61.)
Putin, Primakov, and Medvedev, along with Kissinger and his U.S. confreres, appear to be working toward the same objective announced by Gaither more than 50 years ago.
See also "Rooting for World Government."
What I remember about Henry Kissinger is that in March 1973, a map was published that showed what he had agreed to in the aftermath of the Christmas bombing.
He left entire swaths of South Vietnam occupied by both VC and NVA in place as of the moment of ceasfire. As a college freshman, I was startled by that - sure didnt seem like a good idea.
It was clearly a case of getting a deal, any deal, that would allow the US to beat feet without an immediate disaster...but eventually one would come.
Kissinger is not against the basic aims of Statism, merely its form, and who will run the show. Had Linebacker II continued into mid-January 1973, and pressed on into wiping out Hanoi’s industrial capacity and the ability to resupply their forces in the South, then the outcome of his negotitations with Le Duc Tho would have been different. It would have been an actual victory. But he stopped short of that, and Nixon went along with that, guaranteeing that somewhere along the line, the North would mount a resumption of hostilities, and ultimately win. Apparently he was OK with this result.
No matter what the Putin fellating cheerleaders here in FR say, without Putin invading all of Ukraine rather than just the Donbas and Luhansk Provinces the Great Reset was dead- Covid and the Death Vax had failed miserably in the eyes of the WEF. They needed to pivot to Plan B - WAR.
Putin followed their orders on Feb 24, and invaded Ukraine, after positioning the Russian forces almost 4 months prior to crossing the line. (Sound anything like Desert Storm? F_ck yes it does…) The WEF knew what sanctions would be levied before this took place as part of the plan.
The resulting supply chain issues and excuses by the beyond corrupt US Administration exacerbated the situation, resulting in further fracturing of US politics, also as planned. The “conservative” movement sided with Putin against America, further weakening any response to the war by the US.
China, initially discouraged by the extreme sanctions by the West against Russia refrained from invading Taiwan, and instead locked down the enemies of Xi Jinping in Shanghai for “zero Covid” excuses, triggering further supply chain issues. After seeing the smokescreen of sanctions and corruption, China invades Taiwan, decimating the worldwide supply of advanced semiconductors. The world economy falls into World War III, with Russia/China/N Korea/Iran as the new Axis nations.
Nuclear exchange follows, with the Southern Hemisphere mostly safe. The Northern Hemisphere is decimated by fallout. China loses over 1 billion, Russia returns to the Stone Age, and the US becomes uninhabitable except for a few regions. The Middle East wars are finished, as they are all dead.
Many here on FR side with The Axis. Yeah, you know who you are.
The enemy is indeed among us.
Kissinger: Obama is perfectly positioned to create a New World Order 🌍
That’s basically what Kissinger said more than 10 years ago
Trying to find the video
(Yes 2009. It’s a flashback)
Yeah that’s what I’m thinking of
It was a short video only about 3 minutes or so
I ran across it (again) just a few weeks ago too
Keep in mind, in “Dreams of My Father”, Obama himself credited Frank Marshall Davis as being the one who shaped his [hard left marxists] beliefs.
While American, FMD was a known agent of the KGB -
And “0” doesn’t stand alone in the current US political
class, with life long KGB/FSB groomers by a long shot.
I’d suggest that the Covid and jab phase probably exceeded their expectations, as the next phases of those continue apace and the Ukraine step is continuing their larger depop and Great Reset goals as planned. Agreed that Kissinger’s boys Klaus and Vlad are likely coordinated in the Ukraine gambit.
Soros wants all out war with Russia and Kissinger wants to negotiate with Russia.
In my lifetime both Soros and Kissinger have been characterized as the Antichrist.
So pick which Antichrist you want to follow...sarc
These guys should be concerned about meeting their Maker. They have few days left.
Daniel 7:23 says they’ll eventually be successful.
I DO hope they enjoy what they get from it.
Covid-19(84) and the multiple jabs made for a nice dry run for the Mark of the Beast.
Dividing people, controlling how people can buy (and sometimes if they’re allowed to sell). Restricting travel.
Oh, and the calls to eliminate cash...........Gee, what a surprise.
Soon to come!! Watching and waiting!
Yeah its hard to keep track of ones Anti-Christs these days!
So we have Soros opposed to Kissinger yet we have been told they are on the same team...
What to do what to do!
Kissinger is both a Holocaust survivor and a US WWII veteran who fought the Nazis. But he wants the west to compromise with evil. I wonder if he ever thought that is what the West should have done with Hitler?
We never should have been in Vietnam. We also never should have been in South Korea.
We didn’t need to deploy our military anywhere after WWII.
Kissinger turns 99 today. Soros is also older than dirt. What do these people take?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.