Replies

I think you might find this interesting:

Greg Phillips was one involved in the geotracking, and he says he has much more than than what was presented in 2000 mules. Well worth the listen. Runtime 47:25 (you can skip the first 5-10 minutes at least). When you finally see Greg on the screen is the best place to start at.

Just shaking my head - if there is more proof, why not bring it forward when making the movie? I can't buy this theory that rather than simply present proof, drip it out as some kind of media play.

A lot of it boils down to this - President Trump's brand is about winning. But I don't care about brands. No human wins all the time, and that's just fine.

Trump won on the Supreme Court. Trump won on taxes. Trump won on changing the Republican party.

Trump had a mixed record on foreign policy and the wall.

Trump lost on repealing Obamacare, passing infrastructure, and appointing the "best people" to positions of importance.

Trump won in 2016, when almost no polls predicted it. Trump lost in 2020, which was what most polls predicted. It's not what we wanted, but it happened.

The voting machines weren't rigged. China packet captures never materialized. OANN retracted their story about GA election workers and paid them off with an apology. The AZ cyber audit found more votes for Biden than originally counted.

We don't need Trump to be a flawless God. Can't he just be a historic and uniquely disruptive President who is well-positioned to win again in 2024?

Conservative principles should stand on their own merit, instrinically, without the need for endless hyperbole, shams and conspiracies. It's not needed. And if anything, convincing conservatives that elections are rigged against them depresses that vote. Look at the two senators from GA.