[Observator]

I don't know. She was under indictment for a year, and one of the parties involved had already pled guilty. To be credible, it would be good to see 2,000 Mules identify someone that wasn't already under investigation.

Also, there's always the tried and true way to look at this: follow the money.

Fox and NewsMax haven't brought up 2,000 Mules. Why? I've seen some claim that these outlets hate Trump, but that's silly talk. A documentary with conclusive evidence of voter fraud would be a ratings bonanza for these networks. There's only one possible reason they wouldn't cover these claims - the same reason they backed off the Dominion angle.

It's because the claims don't have any empirical backing and could put them in jeopardy of a massive lawsuit.

[Robert DeLong]

That’s not following the money. That is just fear, which is why I watch neither for news. Like I said, this is no longer the land of the free, nor is it any longer the home of the brave.