Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdsteel
See Post #21.

Nobody in Pennsylvania with half a brain has ever been able to explain to me why it was so imperative to adopt a "no-excuses" mail-in voting process under state law in the first place.

22 posted on 05/24/2022 7:29:08 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child; Robert DeLong

Because you are starting from faulty information.

I am repeating myself but it seems too many people don’t know the true story of act 77.

The original act was passed by the Senate and House in Pennsylvania. Democrats sued, and a deal was struck between the PA Supreme Court and Democrat Governor Wolf which changed act 77 to include unfettered mail in ballots, drop boxes and the rest of the unconstitutional nonsense.

That’s right, the bill was changed by the court and the governor. And what’s worse, they in essence tried to change the state constitution with a bill which is also unconstitutional. It stunk to high heaven from the get-go.

Mastriano fought against it, and the PA Supreme Court basically said no one has been harmed yet. You have to wait until the election once someone is harmed. When that came to pass they said latches, which means oh sorry too late.

Act 77 was recently found, correctly, as unconstitutional by a PA court and repealed.


34 posted on 05/24/2022 2:58:42 PM PDT by jdsteel (Do I really need a /sarc?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson