Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj
I doubt interstate commerce is involved.

It doesn't have to be. I refer you to Wickard v Fillmore (317 U.S. 111 (1942)).

53 posted on 05/22/2022 8:55:20 AM PDT by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: sima_yi
It doesn't have to be. I refer you to Wickard v Fillmore (317 U.S. 111 (1942)).

After they get rid of Roe, maybe they'll get rid of this one too.

ML/NJ

58 posted on 05/22/2022 11:41:25 AM PDT by ml/nj ("If the Representatives of the People betray their Constituents ..." Federalist #28; READ IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: sima_yi

Ah, more bad judicial precedent.


67 posted on 05/22/2022 2:41:31 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson