Replies

Santa Anna to McArdle, March 16, 1874

Letter Explaining Why the Alamo Defenders Had to Be Killed

Mexico March 19, 1874 Mr. H.A. McArdle Independence, Texas

Dear Sir: In
response to your favor of the 4th of January, I have to say that in regard to
the restitution or restoration of the fortress of the Alamo, in April 1836 there
is but little I can add to what was said in my official dispatches, and what was
notorious. Notwithstanding, for your satisfaction, I will add that, that conflict
of arms was bloody, because the chief Travis, who commanded the forces of
the Alamo, would not enter into any capitulation, and his responses were
insulting, which made it imperative to assault the fort before it could be
reinforced by Samuel Houston who was marching to its succor with
respectable forces. The obstinancy of Travis and his soldiers was the cause of
the death of the whole of them, for not one would surrender. The struggle
lasted more than two hours, and until the ramparts were resolutely scaled by
Mexican soldiers.

Hoping this explanation will fill your wishes and that you will be satisfied of my
good disposition to be truthful, as I am your obedient servant A.L. de Santa Anna