Posted on 05/16/2022 10:39:41 AM PDT by JonPreston
While claiming to “preserve peace,” NATO has a history of bombing civilians and committing war crimes.
The three smartest words that Donald Trump uttered during his presidential campaign are “NATO is obsolete.” His adversary, Hillary Clinton, retorted that NATO was “the strongest military alliance in the history of the world.” Now that Trump has been in power, the White House parrots the same worn line that NATO is “the most successful Alliance in history, guaranteeing the security, prosperity, and freedom of its members.” But Trump was right the first time around: Rather than being a strong alliance with a clear purpose, this 70-year-old organization that met in London on December 4 is a stale military holdover from the Cold War days that should have gracefully retired many years ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at citizentruth.org ...
‘Germany will rearm’ - that’s hilarious.
The US military has to waste space, time and money keeping obsolete equipment functional so ‘powerhouses’ like Germany can keep operating with us. As a fellow German War College comrade told me - ‘why should we buy anything when we know you’ll just give it to us when you replace it?’
NATO is a vehicle for globalism, which always puts American last. It needs to die.
““Soccer is a gentleman’s game watched by hooligans.
Rugby is a hooligan’s game watched by gentlemen!””
Very good!
And you’re agist, to boot!
If we belong in nato then Europe should be protecting our southern border 🤪
Brits have always looked down their nose at American Football.
I agree.
Butler is a very under rated General and had an amazing career.
no sir
I guess their contempt is why they play those NFL games in London!
+1
Agree. Letting in 1 million uneducated Muslims and banking on China trade and the Euro, will all lead to disaster
I see that you chose to post this as “Extended News” despite it being an opinion piece from Medea Benjamin from two and a half years ago.
It’s a sign that you’re stomping your feet looking for attention, now that other countries are looking at what Putin / Russia did to Ukraine, and are quite understandably looking for ways to protect themselves.
As to whether they should be allowed to join NATO, I’m sure there are many good arguments pro and con. But is this screen sidebar-worthy “Extended News”? NO!!
“It’s about time nato was abolished. Along with the UN.”
from the wikipedia NATO page (history section):
In the 1990s, the organization extended its activities into political and humanitarian situations that had not formerly been NATO concerns
clearly explains why NATO should have been abolished after the fall of the wall
“NATO still has a place in 2022.”
What place?
The mission was complete and the alliance should have disbanded or at least significantly scaled back it’s operations.
If the wall truly fell and the west was looking to meet the east, then there would be no need for NATO. If the wall fell so NATO could be expanded and Russia can be swallowed up, well then here we are in 2022
you only need to go as far as wikipedia to see that NATO has lost it’s mission purpose.
In the 1990s, the organization extended its activities into political and humanitarian situations that had not formerly been NATO concerns.
I can think on entire departments of the government that should be disbanded immediately and completely.
lets start with the Dept of Education
and then the Dept of Housing and Urban Development
Do we REALLY need the ATF?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.