Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleBob

Sarbanes-Oxley compliance is no walk in the park, nor does it carry a small price tag for companies who traditionally have underfunded or undervalued the accounting function.


19 posted on 05/13/2022 5:38:48 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: one guy in new jersey
... nor does it carry a small price tag for companies who traditionally have underfunded or undervalued the accounting function.

And yet the State of NY thinks that it's arcane rules for company valuation might trap a Trump company, that follows SOX compliance?

Not likely.

37 posted on 05/13/2022 6:02:51 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: one guy in new jersey; mewzilla
Agreed...most folks haven't a clue how much teeth are in SOX.

I wouldn't be surprised if the sell off is not just based on fear that the implicit price support of the acquisition is going away...I think the market may also be worried about a massive SOX violation and the attendant crippling impact.

The really funny thing, is SOX was signed by Dubya.

49 posted on 05/13/2022 6:29:45 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson