Posted on 05/12/2022 1:46:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Leading employment lawyers answer HR's pressing questions around mental health accommodation
It’s Mental Health Week – and while it’s a great reminder of the importance of psychological wellbeing, the truth is that every week should be Mental Health Week. And, for HR leaders, it normally is. Mental health concerns have skyrocketed since the pandemic. In Canada, employees are feeling more, stressed, depressed, and isolated than ever before – something that may not automatically reset when they return to the office. Employers need to brace themselves for a tsunami of mental health accommodation requests this summer - the most obvious being time off to deal with personal struggles.
“There’s two aspects to this issue,” executive coach and organizational expert Jim Frawley told HRD. “Is this a question of should employees take time off for mental health concerns, or whether they actually do?
“From a macro, theoretical standpoint, organizations should encourage time off for mental health concerns. When an employee isn't at their best, they aren't providing the value that they can. Theoretically for individuals, they should absolutely take time off – we’re far more important as human beings than any company project. So, on the surface, it's simple.”
Are employees entitled to mental health leave?
From a legal outlook, employers in Canada have some leeway when it comes to granting accommodation requests. As always, employers are encouraged to accommodate staff up until undue hardship – meaning that if you can be flexible, you really should be.
“Taking time off for mental health issues is the same as any time off for other issues,” added Lorenzo Lisi, partner at law firm Aird & Berlis. “Whether it’s paid or unpaid or covered by short- or long-term disability depends on the employers’ policies and practices. In certain provinces employees are also entitled to other leaves, such as in Ontario for Personal Emergency Leave days – all 10 of them - which are unpaid and provided under the ESA. Employers also often have Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) which provide guidance and resources for employees who need confidential assistance with mental health issues, however they may arise.”
Stress seems to be the main driver for employee absence right now. The pandemic coupled with remote work and a shed load of overtime has blurred the lines between work and home – leading to mounting pressure. The notion of ‘stress leave’ in Ontario was debated pre-pandemic, with some employee advocacy groups calling on businesses to do more to alienate the burden. However, according to Stephen Wolpert, partner at Toronto-based law firm Whitten & Lubbin, it’s hardly law yet.
“There is no special or specific entitlement to stress leave,” he told HRD. “Stress is a part of life; we all experience it and are all expected to cope with it in the workplace. However, sometimes stress goes beyond manageable levels and can actually be considered a disability – such as Acute Stress Disorder or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. In those cases, employees can make use of sick leaves, which are protected in employment standards legislation and may sometimes be enhanced by the employer’s sick leave and disability policies.”
Does an employee have to reveal mental health issues to HR?
Oftentimes employees simply don’t feel comfortable enough disclosing and mental health concerns to their employer. A recent report found that almost one four in ten employees would choose not to tell their HR leader if they were struggling – despite that being exactly what HR’s there for. But personal choice and a legal obligation are very different – and many employers are unsure as to whether they can request mental health records, especially if they’re asking for time off.
“Employees do not have a general obligation to disclose mental health or other health issues to their employers,” Cameron Wardell, associate at Mathews Dinsdale, told HRD Canada. “An obligation to disclose may arise if an employee is seeking an accommodation for his or her mental health issue or is seeking the use of a benefit such as sick leave, or if an employee’s disability is having an impact on the conduct of their position. Indeed, employers may, from time to time, be faced with a situation where they have a duty to inquire.”
A compassionate approach to accommodation requests
In the current talent market, branding and values are everything. Even though you might not have to grant employees time off to deal with mental health issues, it might be a good idea to at least consider it. As Frawley told HRD, employees don’t make a habit of requesting time off for depression or anxiety unless they’re really struggling.
“In general, people don’t take off the time that they need for mental health concerns,” explained Frawley. “And it makes sense - they have bills to pay, they may hesitate because it could be perceived as a weakness; the organizational culture or direct manager may not allow for it. Also, some people have made the recognition that there IS a mental health issue and may be in denial. Add to that, the workplace is a big driver of many of our mental health challenges.
“This is changing - the conversation on mental health is happening; people are seeing that they aren’t alone, that other people have dealt with something similar, and that there are solutions and ways to address these challenges. This conversation needs to go much deeper and happen on a broader scale, and we will see that happen. The more the conversation occurs, the more individuals see that they aren’t alone and that they have the ability to deal with their challenges in a really productive way, with proper support, conversation and more.”
Finding a strategy that works for you As with all things in HR and organizational planning, a ‘one-size-fits-all’ plan never works. To understand what works best for your individual mental health plan, sit down and speak with your employees. Consider adding in an additional day of Mental Health Leave into your annual leave offerings, schedule regular self-care days, ensure that your employees aren’t overworking their allotted hours.
Often, when we speak about mental health, it’s in a reactionary form – we’ve seen the issues arise and now we have to help cure them. Instead, employers should be taking a preventative approach. Don’t wait until your people are so stressed and depressed that they’re coming to you for help – instead, help foster a culture that promotes wellbeing and helps stem any underlying mental health concerns.
A better question would be, “When considering employee productivity and retention, does it make sense for an employer to allow ‘mental health leave’ as opposed to not allowing it?”
Tits on a bull
Sure, upaid time off or quit. Otherwise, if a company offers sick time, if they go to a doc, sure. And if PTO where it doesn’t matter why, then also sure. But another category of time off, no.
Don’t hire democrats.
Dear “stressed”out little panzies, You have a God Given Right to DIE in the street from your own laziness or stupidity and my only obligation to society is to help put the dead bodies in the back of the truck to go to the dump so they don’t stink up the neighborhood.
We had guys do it all the time. Call in sick. Just don’t say what it is.
I never approved until later in life where we could see the stupid games management played. You mean they never lied to us?
A lot of companies are going to a policy of allowing a certain amount of time off and not characterizing it as vacation vs. sick time vs. personal time. If you have a medical reason for taking a lengthy amount of time, you move to the company short term disability policy, which is governed by insurance company rules. Then you move to long term disability which also is governed by insurance company rules. So the move to give people “mental health” days is just marketing BS to try to glom onto the current PC trends. The reality is that if you take more than a historically customary amount of time off (no matter what you call it), you are subject to your company’s insurance provider overlords.
There’s some irony here. Decades ago at least a white collar employee was expected to maintain a balanced private life. Divorces, long singlehood, excess partying, and how they handled private drama were considered reflective of how effective the employee might be and whether they would bring credit or damage to the company reputation. Then companies decided employee private lives were none of their business, so long as the employee produced effectively at work. Now, having decided that life balance wasn’t important to their employees and seeing the implosion of family life, companies are having to step into the shoes of what used to be family concerns. Companies must somehow keep the employee on balance or face prolonged absences, possible drama and reputation damage, not to mention decreased efficiency.
We are, unfortunately, becoming a society that only values someone who entertains us or makes us a profit. How they are handling the rest of their lives is irrelevant. So people are imploding mentally and so long as they continue to produce, we don’t care. So we encourage train wrecks of personal lives and the cost is increasing. We need only look at the likes of Johnnie Depp and Amber Heard, the Kardashians, Simon Bilal, Naomi Judd, Will Smith, Kurt Cobain and so many others. We need to get back to encouraging healthy balance, not just perfection in one aspects of a life in disregard to other aspects.
I even have to work on vacations because I don’t want to come home to emergencies. It’s been more stressful since Covid. I am ready to retire.
The answer is Yes in WA state. 12 weeks paid leave per year for any medical condition or to care for family member as well. (~1/4 year, per year, ever year, paid leave)
I call it having vision problems as in I just can’t see going to work today.
Evidently Biden isn’t.
I don’t think an on the ball human resources department would hire anyone who needs “mental health leave.”
What about a person who has it from a brain tumor?
“mental health Leave”— otherwise known as vacation.
That’s informative, thanks!
A few days a year - I just call in and tell ‘em I’m heading to the golf course... guess the Canucks would call that a ‘mental health day’...
⛳
I don’t know about “entitled to “, but I’ve worked with several that should have been required to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.