Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Ukraine has no "national sovereignty."

So you Putlim keyboard warriors have finally degenerated into Putlim asskissers to the extent you repeat his laughable sophistry where Putlim is the sole dictator who determines who has "national sovereignty.".

*spit* on you and everything that looks like you, bitch. Enjoy what is left of your limited time on this website.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova: Latvia has lost its sovereignty because of NATO and Washington

"Latvia lost its economic, military and humanitarian sovereignty when it agreed to deploy US and NATO troops on its territory, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.

"If the Latvian Foreign Ministry appreciates the meaning of freedom, it would not encourage the deployment of foreign military units on its territory," Zakharova was quoted as saying by the RIA Novosti news agency.


20 posted on 05/11/2022 2:33:30 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


ALL of NATOs members are NON-states, according to Putlim.

And this is EXACTLY what he told the world on the eve of his invasion.

There can be NO treaty that does not address Putin specifically renouncing his laughably egregious, stale-ass, sophomoric, take-your-deranged-Communifesto-and-shove-it-right-in-your-pootie-pipe:

"In view of the historical destiny of Russia and its peoples, the Leninist principles of state-building were not only a mistake, but far worse than a mistake. After the collapse of the USSR in 1991 this became absolutely obvious.

Of course, the events of the past cannot be changed, but we must at least speak about them directly and honestly, without reservations and without political coloration. I can only add that the considerations of the current political conjuncture, however spectacular and advantageous they may seem at a given moment, should not or cannot under any circumstances form the basis for the fundamental principles of statehood.

This is neither the time nor the place to discuss issues of state or constitutional law and to define the concept of citizenship. Nevertheless, the question arises: why did the country have to be shaken even further under these already difficult circumstances?"

Putin said it out loud, in black and white, and laid down a permanent marker: "You -- the Ukraine, Latvia, ALL NATO members, have no 'state', you have no "national sovereignty", and you have no 'citizenship' -- other than what I grant you of all of those 3 -- so, I'm going to Kiev (to get my ass kicked)".

25 posted on 05/11/2022 2:37:36 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: StAnDeliver
Oh yes, Latvia was so much better off when. It was being occupied involuntarily by Russian troops whom it never wanted in the first place.

Makes you wonder why, if it is so horrible to belong to NATO, Sweden and Finland decide to join.

Unlike how the Soviet Union treated Hungary and Czechoslovakia when they tried to leave the Warsaw Pact in 1956 and 1968, when France asked for NATO troops to be withdrawn from France in 1966, we just...left.

One of these things is not like the other.

28 posted on 05/11/2022 2:39:13 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson