The author didn’t mention the Hero/Chanpion/Lord of Free Speech/Immortal Elon Musk. He’s doing the same thing.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-tesla-abortions-roe-v-wade-marco-rubio-2022-5
For some reason it seemed like so many were touting him and him buying Twitter as some sign of his conservative ideology. My bad.
Once again it’s our army of volunteer adoptive parents. Where are they? Waiting for the final decision? The left is down. We should pounce like they would. For them it’s about November and an issue that’s not #1 in the voters minds.
I’m wondering where the billionaires are that could jump start the idea. They don’t even have to be pro-life, just be there for the girls in trouble.
31 states have introduced abortion bans this year
Hmmmmmm…….could that mean that 31 states are controlled, to some level if not completely, by Republicans. If so, imagine what could happen if they united and stood shoulder to shoulder against Cornpop and his puppet masters.
This country would change over night. But, among that 31 are too many RINO POSs like Kemp and Hutchinson for that to happen
Its most likely cheaper to provide funds for an abortion than to give the woman and possibly a man months of maternity leave. This effort wears the cloak of generosity but underneath beats the heart of greed.
So WH doesn’t Microsoft just move to where abortion is legal?
Some day scientists are going to figure out what causes pregnancy and how to avoid it, so we don’t have to constantly talk about abortion
Some countries have very low age of consent laws, and people have been arrested when they travel to those countries to partake in illicit sex. By the same logic, could not a state make it illegal for one of their citizens to travel to another state in order to do something that’s illegal in their home state?
Would it not be cheaper to have sessions on Birth Control and all the alternatives rather than waiting and paying for abortions? Or does that make too much sense?
There are quite a number of birth control methods out there to use, men and women, and much cheaper to have prevention of unwanted pregnancies rather going to the expense of paying for a a out of state abortion.
I can see abortion services opening within Riverboat Casinos and Indian Reservations.
I wonder if anyone has asked these companies if they cover expenses for other employees who have to travel for other health care? Things like, say, transplants, advanced surgeries, and other advanced treatments not readily available everywhere?
If they aren’t covering the costs for those employees, without complaint or questions, then aren’t they denying those employees health equity or something along those lines?
That’s in Microsoft’s interests, but not its employees.
Indeed it’s why every employee at Microsoft is a temp.
Can't have that, y'know!
Discriminatory.