Posted on 05/07/2022 4:59:35 AM PDT by arfingcat
I could change my mind about any political aspect, I could go completely crazy and believe that communism is a brilliant idea, or even, God forbid, I could lose my faith and deny everything my Church says. But none of that would move me to give up in good conscience my fight against the silent genocide of abortion in the West.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Any individual that has molded their conscience to acquiesce to the killing of pre born human life is quite capable of any abomination. Such a person should never be trusted in any matter of importance. It is also wise to avoid these people to the greatest extent possible and have only the most superficial relationship with them when absolutely necessary.
Abortion seems naturally linked to communism.
That is part of “liberating women”, as motherhood is slavery to them.
Slowly but surely, ageing childless female workers in the West are realizing they’ve been had - and will be worked to death paying for other peoples’ children.
I love that Ron Desantis is making baby products tax free.
Bookmark
Socialism and abortion are both forms of slavery.
I remember a time when people were generally against slavery, but I suppose these days we’re too enlightened and progressive for that.
FETAL ORGAN EXPERIMENTS
https://www.judicialwatch.org/aborted-human-tissue-lab-contacted-nih-for-publicity-help
ABORTION-INDUSTRIAL-COMPLEX
Facts:
Social Security pension plan started with 14 wage earners paying in for every 1 beneficiary.
Today there are 2 wage earners paying in for every 1 beneficiary.
Conclusion: We are screwed.
Solution:
Strengthen Judeo-Christian values, standards, practices.
Strengthen marriages.
Increase father’s pay to support family as single wage earner.
Encourage women to have children, make healthy homes and communities.
For women with extraordinary gifts (lawyers, doctors, scientists), provide direct tax credits for nanny services.
Bottom line:
America needs babies right now!
A sensible "cost-of-business" type of concept!
It is a given that our culture values the benefits of "mothership" in the development of our youngest (or at least has from an historical perspective).
On first impression the concept would seem to fall under the same general heading as tax deductions for home office expenses.
An employed female professional (or business owner, etc.) can likely afford nanny services. The sticky point, however, will be to define "extraordinary gifts" in a scheme that makes sense to all taxpayers.
Are you aware of any models of such a scheme?
Legislative language can be word-smithed to accomplish loss mitigation for professional women who suffer business loss and costs associated with childbearing.
The dilemma faced by such women could be addressed by viewing the decision as a business decision and as you say, a cost of doing business.
The tax criteria would likely be income based rather than ‘talent’ based. I mentioned the term ‘talent’ because the dilemma is a choice between two imperatives, one being utilization of talents to benefit society, and the other using one’s anatomy to bear offspring to benefit society. No easy solution but I think society must try to address and do what’s necessary to get it right.
As a parent, I get it; as a taxpayer, I could see how childless taxpayers might resent it.
“I could see how childless taxpayers might resent it.”
Childless citizens also resent having to pay school taxes. And picking up the slack at work while others are home for months at a time on “parental leave”, or taking off because kids are ill. (The sick-kid story often is a lie, but it’s a convenient excuse.)
All true; I’ve noticed many of the childless women now just substitute ageing parents as convenient excuses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.