Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State adopts rule to require more electric cars (NM adopts California emission rules)
The Santa Fe New Mexican ^ | May 6, 2022 | Scott Wyland

Posted on 05/06/2022 5:08:53 PM PDT by CedarDave

New Mexicans will see thousands more electric vehicles available to buy in 2025 when a rule approved by two environmental boards takes effect.

Dubbed the clean-car rule, it will require that electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids make up at least 7 percent of automakers’ new sales within New Mexico — adding up to an estimated 3,800 vehicles.

The rule aligns with California's current standards and is part of the larger effort to cut climate-warming greenhouse gases as well as ground-level ozone and particulates that can cause respiratory problems.

It will undergo a two-year waiting period to allow manufacturers, car dealers and regulators to prepare, and then take effect in the 2026 model year, which is January 2025.

The state Environmental Improvement Board and the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board voted unanimously Thursday to adopt the rule.

Electric vehicle advocates and conservationists called the rule an important step in offering people alternatives to fossil-fuel cars.

The prospect of New Mexico aligning with California as it toughens mandates concerned some local dealers, who didn't think they should be forced to carry a certain volume of electric cars, and a farming advocate who argued the push to replace gas-powered cars with more costly electric ones will cause financial hardship in rural communities.

(Excerpt) Read more at santafenewmexican.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2manylaws; 2manytaxes; automobiles; climatechange; environment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: CedarDave

They are digging the economic pit deeper.


21 posted on 05/06/2022 6:43:14 PM PDT by wjcsux (RIP Rush Limbaugh 12 Jan 1951- 17 Feb 2021. We really miss you. 😢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Given the rampant supply chain problems, I would say that 7% of nothing is still nothing.


22 posted on 05/06/2022 6:44:45 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Electric cars are about limiting people’s movements.
It is to get as many people as possible to cluster in a specific area so they can be easily controlled.


23 posted on 05/06/2022 6:47:02 PM PDT by TexasM1A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Brother Go to Hell; CedarDave

I was in NM in 2005. So much of the state is spread-out desert. You would only need to worry about pollution in Albuquerque and maybe Santa Fe.


24 posted on 05/06/2022 6:48:29 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

How can an individual, buying personal property, hit 7% of anything? And how can they refuse to allow someone to bring their own property across state lines? That is INTERSTATE commerce. Think federal court case.

But I suppose they could put in a $10,000 tax on out of state purchases.


25 posted on 05/06/2022 6:51:36 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Do these people ever leave their houses? All one has to do is drive over that big, rambling mountain range east of ABQ and then behold sprawling desert, followed by more desert (and the town of Moriarty).


26 posted on 05/06/2022 6:51:46 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
This is a replay of what California did 33 years ago...which failed spectacularly.

California’s Original EV Mandate

By William J. Kelly
June 25, 2019

In 1990, the California Air Resources Board adopted what became known as California’s zero emissions vehicle mandate under a federal Clean Air Act waiver. CARB’s mandate required that by 1998, two percent of the passenger cars sold by automakers be battery electric vehicles, with the level rising to 10 percent by 2003. The aim of the mandate was to clean up unhealthy smog.

General Motors responded by introducing the EV 1 in 1996, which could go about 60 miles on a charge. In turn, the state of California authorized utilities to invest in a network of public EV charging stations. State agencies began spending untold millions of dollars to subsidize chargers, including signage to publicize them to motorists.

To salvage their investment, GM later renamed the EV 1 the "Impact," probably the worse name ever for an automobile.
27 posted on 05/06/2022 8:25:09 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (Instead of criminalizing guns, we need to criminalize criminals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Brother Go to Hell

Californi had a legitimate issue.

Not any longer. The emissions controls put in place have been effective.

All it is is CARB trying to keep itself relevant.


28 posted on 05/06/2022 8:57:33 PM PDT by SPDSHDW (You get what you let occur with no resistance. Everything Joepedo n' felons do is on your head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

California will not register diesel trucks for commercial purposes with an engine that is not 2010 or newer.

They haven’t been for 2 years now. No one has stopped them.


29 posted on 05/06/2022 9:05:41 PM PDT by SPDSHDW (You get what you let occur with no resistance. Everything Joepedo n' felons do is on your head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

So, maybe the Hobbs Technical Vocation Center could offer a certificate in electric car battery pack rebuilding. (I’ve long been a proponent of “Trade Schools’ (And apprenticeship programs).


30 posted on 05/06/2022 10:16:55 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
I’m not sure a state can refuse to register a car bought out of state.

CA has been doing that since the 80s. It used to be cars were labeled as CA-compliant or 50-state compliant for emissions. Those that did not meet CA's regulations could not be registered there.

And yes, even vehicles that meet the standard for when they were manufactured are being forced off CA roads. I have in-laws there who have to sell perfectly good diesel trucks because they don't meet current standards. Even though they meet the standards that were in place when they were originally sold. They have to be sold out of state.

31 posted on 05/06/2022 11:32:26 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Do these people ever leave their houses? All one has to do is drive over that big, rambling mountain range east of ABQ and then behold sprawling desert, followed by more desert (and the town of Moriarty).

While most of the state is wide-open desert with some forests, that range due east of Albuquerque does cause some pollution issues. I live NW of Albuquerque in Rio Rancho (Sandoval County). We don't have to emissions test here, but my buddy two miles south of me, in NW ABQ (Bernalillo County) does. Technically, I am supposed to test if I commute over x-number of days per year into ABQ, but there's no way to enforce that.

The mountains tend to trap the air in the Rio Grande valley. You can see the haze just about year round looking east toward the mountains. It's really not bad, but it is there. The wind blows so much here it tends to clear it out on a regular basis.

The worst pollution in the state now is the smoke from the U.S. Forest Service-caused Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon fire complex north of us.

32 posted on 05/06/2022 11:41:06 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

If EV drivers were mandated to buy ONLY green-generated electricity for their EV’s, drivers would feel the actual cost of facilitating this fraud…it would be harder to implement mandates.


33 posted on 05/07/2022 4:12:01 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

The brownout will stop this.


34 posted on 05/07/2022 4:13:14 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

The electric cars are unaffordable to the average American and this is the plan, everyone else will be riding bicycles very few will have electric cars and they solved the climate change problem and killed the oil industry that stands in their way


35 posted on 05/07/2022 4:33:37 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

There is a difference between a car that doesn’t meet a mechanical standard and a car whose purchase would result in the state falling short of a 7% electric goal. But obviously the courts take a “government uber alles” approach. I just don’t understand how it can be legal. But I guess I don’t see how much of our current government is constitutional!


36 posted on 05/07/2022 9:09:27 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
But I guess I don’t see how much of our current government is constitutional!

About 10% of it.

37 posted on 05/07/2022 11:09:49 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson