Thanks for taking time to build this informative post. It contained a lot of useful information.
Aside from dealing with immediate battlefield threats, the UA would be smart to prowl the Russian rear areas with its drones to locate and destroy Russian soft skinned vehicles.
Such vehicles are normally associated with combat support and combat service support functions, especially supply, maintenance, and communications. They tend to be produced in smaller numbers and are often operated by specialist troops. So they (the specially configured vehicles and the technically trained soldiers) are not easily replaced. Knocking out…say, a motor vehicle maintenance unit may be more damaging in the long term than destroying a similar number of combat vehicles since the former unit is needed to keep the latter operating. Ditto for food, water, fuel, ammunition. The consumption rates on these commodities are significant and resupply must be continuous. Any interruption …
Of course, the same applies to the UA and there have been reports of Russian attacks on manufacturing plants, as well. Occasionally, the Russians even hit what they are actually targeting.
The UA is employing buggies with ATMs on them for hit and run raids - is article about that on the War Zone.
Russians have deployed combat dolphins at their sub pens in Sevastopol where they load Kalibr missiles on subs. The total combined smart missile launches are about 30 a day. How long can they sustain that rate?
UA is using rockets and drones to hit military and energy infrastructure inside Russia - someone even sabotaged a big electrical power plant in the Far East.