Posted on 04/21/2022 11:46:36 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19
The U.S. Army has selected Sig Sauer to build the service’s Next-Generation Squad Weapon Rifle and Automatic Rifle.
This is the first time in 55 years that the Army has broken away from the M16 series of weapons. The new rifles are designed to be more lethal and accurate than previous infantry weapons.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Army officially selected a new rifle and infantry rifle for frontline troops. The guns, developed by small arms manufacturer Sig Sauer, have been officially designated the XM5 Rifle and XM250 Automatic Rifle (pictured above). The XM5 Rifle will represent a major departure from the M16 series of weapons, first adopted in 1967 and still in use today.
The XM5 Rifle will replace the M4A1 Carbine as the Army’s close-combat weapon, while the XM250 Automatic Rifle will replace the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon. Both weapons will be equipped with the M157 Next-Generation Squad Weapon-Fire Control (NGSW-FC), an optic designed to allow troops to observe and hit targets from greater distances.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Thats pretty cool
I agree, but I an curious about how it would perform
Absolutely - who knows, if the military ends up going with the new high-tech cartridge, and orders a gazillion rounds, that modular cartridge case that can handle 80,000 psi could become the “new normal”...
I was gonna say, they’re not worried about dissimilar metals corrosion?
CC
Strange their going to the equivalent of the .270 Cal that was tested and approved of the 1930’s and stopped by MacArthur because we had millions of rounds of .30 cal ammo
Why is the Military allergic to the 6.5 CM? I know, high pressures and it can wear out a barrel. That is a concern for a hunting rifle, not a military spec barrel. If the 7.62 was more than good enough at distance, the 6.5 CM is even better.
Reach out and touch someone? 6.5CM will get it done.
That would depend on which hat was being worn.
So basically the same energy and stopping power as the Russian 7.62x54R with increased complexity and cost, and lower reliability?
>>So basically the same energy and stopping power as the Russian 7.62x54R with increased complexity and cost, and lower reliability?<<
More like about the same energy and stopping power as 7.62 NATO, in a rifle weighing about the same as the AR-10, with increased complexity and cost, and lower reliability. And increased barrel wear.
That O ring is actually a metal locking ring it’s not rubber or plastic. This is some sexy cutting edge ammo. 80,000psi is tank gun level pressures which also use two or three piece cases of bimetal construction for the same reasons they are being used here to get max psi without blowing off your case head. These will be stainless steel case heads so rust is not a factor. The Chinese and the Russians both have used exclusively steel cases for small arms ammo since the 1940s they fought a ten plus year war in the jungles of Vietnam with steel steel.cases being transported by oxen carts down a muddy trial in the rain and elements if anyone was going to rust ammo it was then. Steel cases are coated in lacquer that is baked on like am enameled cast iron pan it is physically part of the case you can try to file it off with a grit file and you will just break a sweat trying that’s why rust is a nonissue the primers are also lacquered rendering the cases effectively water proof. The AK47 famously can and will fire underwater with it standard issue lacquered steel cases rounds for this very reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.