Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Twitter already saying to make you liable if someone steals a gun from you and it's used in a crime.. What a mess.
1 posted on 04/21/2022 11:09:59 AM PDT by Houserino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Houserino

Good for us


2 posted on 04/21/2022 11:11:33 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Does this mean the DUI guy gets all the life insurance and lawsuit proceeds?


3 posted on 04/21/2022 11:12:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin ((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

These morons don’t even read the latest laws. How are they going to follow anything?


4 posted on 04/21/2022 11:12:57 AM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commiraspute is lying is when they open their pieholes.p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Twitter already saying to make you liable if someone steals a gun from you and it’s used in a crime..


That doesn’t surprise me. Most reasonable people that were on Twitter are banned.


6 posted on 04/21/2022 11:13:45 AM PDT by cuban leaf (My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

This just in....Turnip to give blood.


7 posted on 04/21/2022 11:17:32 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Of coures they are, because liberals don’t understand the concept of personal responsibility....

You drive drunk you chose and kill someone, that death is directly tied to your personal actions.

If someone steals your gun and later it’s used in a murder, has nothing to do with your actions, the murderer is the person who killed the person, not you.


8 posted on 04/21/2022 11:18:00 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

That is not even in the same universe.

Twitter users are morons.

The moral equivalent to their dumb comments would be if a theif stole their car and killed someone with it...the rightful owner is now responsible?

In this scenario, if a gun owner was drunk and accidentally discharged their firearm, killing someone, should they be responsible? Hell, yes, and in most jurisdictions they already are.


9 posted on 04/21/2022 11:18:34 AM PDT by TheWriterTX (Trust not in earthly princes....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

How about a law that requires people who vote for socialists to pay damages to the rest of us?


10 posted on 04/21/2022 11:20:31 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

This makes sense if the DUI driver can actually afford child support.

But make sure there aren’t unintended consequences like the state cutting off support to the kids that would have occurred, if the DUI driver was not now responsible for child support.

Let the state collect the child support from the DUI, and make sure the kids are supported regardless of whether DUI driver pays up or not.


11 posted on 04/21/2022 11:20:42 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino
Twitter already saying to make you liable if someone steals a gun from you and it's used in a crime.. What a mess.

Whoever USES a stolen gun in a crime should be held liable, not the person it was stolen from.
Same as if someone drives drunk in a stolen car and kills someone, only a Lib would hold the legal owner responsible.

12 posted on 04/21/2022 11:22:07 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Child support? How is anyone making money in such a case. Manslaughter. Jail

In germany, the way it was em when we were there 15 y ago, someone gets caught drunk driving, never mind killing someone, and they lose their license for a year. To get it back it’s $thousands in driving school.

Another offense- rare- and it’s gone forever.

Killing someone? Child support. No. That’s stupid. Jail.

No one drives drunk there.


13 posted on 04/21/2022 11:22:07 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino
DUI is government racketeering business. If they are so serious about it then why are bars even allowed ?

there is a dirty little secret that drowsy/tired drivers kill over 1000x more people than drunk drivers

14 posted on 04/21/2022 11:24:20 AM PDT by KTM rider (, or how Ambassador Stevens was killed because he was about to testify before the UN council )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

I’m guessing it’s going to be pretty hard to collect considering the perp will likely be sitting in a prison cell for the next decade for vehicular homicide....


16 posted on 04/21/2022 11:31:16 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Drunk drivers should be banned from driving for life and should pay everything they have to everyone who is hurt by their actions.


17 posted on 04/21/2022 11:35:14 AM PDT by Arcadian Empire (The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino
This law is already invalid before even beginning because it will we not be applied evenly since drunk illegal aliens won't pay a dime.
20 posted on 04/21/2022 11:42:13 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Looks good on paper. But how is a convicted DUI killer going to provide restitution? If they have any money, it is likely the defense lawyers will have vacuumed up most of it before the judgement is rendered. Once the person gets out of prison, it is unlikely they will find any meaningful job that will provide restitution of any significance..


22 posted on 04/21/2022 11:46:50 AM PDT by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

If this is legally bounded to drunk drivers, this is a just law, and really should have been in place in all states.


24 posted on 04/21/2022 11:49:30 AM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

How, pray tell? They’ll spend every dime they have on their defense lawyer.


25 posted on 04/21/2022 11:57:31 AM PDT by bgill (Which came first, the vax or the virus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

Drunk driving is different. There’s no way this can connect to somebody doing something illegal (such as lying) to obtain a gun and some drunk - in his own car or that of somebody else who has voluntarily and knowingly loaned it to him - roaring out of the lot and mowing down innocent people.

I think it’s a good law.


30 posted on 04/21/2022 1:28:06 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Houserino

It’s as if someone in the Tennessee legislature read Deuteronomy.

Great law. So naturally it won’t pass.


31 posted on 04/21/2022 3:05:05 PM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson