I'm also sure there was significant cheating. I'm just not sure that the cheating was enough to have flipped the result of the election. There were an awful lot of millennials, racial minorities, etc, who normally wouldn't have voted, but voted because it was made so damn easy.
I said legally received.
I’m also sure there was significant cheating. I’m just not sure that the cheating was enough to have flipped the result of the election. There were an awful lot of millennials, racial minorities, etc, who normally wouldn’t have voted, but voted because it was made so damn easy.
That is still cheating and fraud. The fraud is built in. It’s called institutionalized fraud.
“The plan was to destroy the safety and security measures in virtually every state, but particularly the battleground states. What they did in Pennsylvania is a disgrace. They eliminated signature requirements, postal date requirements, extended voting periods. In other words, those safeguards that were in place in Pennsylvania for decades were removed. Now, why would the Democrats want to remove them? To institutionalize corruption and fraud.” - Mark Levin
Ha! Just enough to say maybe, but not enough to say no. Your hair splitting is very clever, albeit transparent.
Approximately 61.7K votes decided the election (PA, WI, AZ, GA) out of 158 million votes allegedly cast.