Posted on 04/20/2022 1:29:35 PM PDT by grundle
I recently told you about California Assembly Bill 2223, which contains a provision preventing any person from being subject to civil or criminal liability “based on actions or omissions with respect to their . . . alleged pregnancy outcome, including . . . perinatal death.” You may recall that the “perinatal” period covers roughly from 28 weeks of pregnancy to 1-4 weeks post birth.
Based on our legal analysis of Assembly Bill 2223, and Maryland Bills 626 and 669, we informed you that the legislation – as proposed – could handicap the investigations into the deaths of newborns and effectively legalize infanticide.
Despite the plethora of “fact check” articles that have denied and downplayed the stark truth of what we’ve been saying about these bills, we now have an official analysis provided by the Chief Counsel for the pro-abortion majority California State Assembly Committee on Judiciary, stating that “the ‘perinatal death’ language could lead to an unintended and undesirable conclusion.” The analysis goes on to say that the bill
may not be sufficiently clear that ‘perinatal death’ is intended to be the consequence of a pregnancy complication. Thus, the bill could be interpreted to immunize a pregnant person from all criminal penalties for all pregnancy related outcomes, including the death of a newborn for any reason during the ‘perinatal’ period after birth, including a cause of death which is not attributable to pregnancy complications . . . .
LifeNews is on GETTR. Please follow us for the latest pro-life news
Exactly. This is what we’ve been raising the alarm about for weeks. It could in fact effectively legalize infanticide.
Contrary to what a lot of the Left seems to believe these days – words actually matter. This is an important point that a lot of “fact-checkers” who have little to no legal training have seemed to miss.
As this official analysis highlights, what a bill’s author says that the bill is intended to do and what the language in a bill actually does are not always the same thing.
The author of Assembly Bill 2223 is now trying to slap a quick fix on the bill by adding some language that is also problematic. We are preparing legal analysis on the amendments that have been adopted, as it appears this bill will make its way through the California Assembly committees and over to the Senate committees.
We will keep you updated as we continue to fight this infanticide bill – and others like it – across the country.
“As this official analysis highlights, what a bill’s author says that the bill is intended to do and what the language in a bill actually does are not always the same thing.”
Funny, as soon as we’re talking about a pro-baby killing bill, the Democrats all become originalists.
When the United States is judged, it will probably be many times worse than what Israel/Judah experienced in their times, and it will be well deserved.
We all know what's important to the Democrats: killing human babies!
We truly are living in a sick world.
Ancient pagan Rome at its worst would leave infants out to die from exposure. China’s one child policy led to rampant infanticide. The modern world is scrapping the bottom of the barrel. At some point God’s Wrath is going to be too open and obvious even for the pagans to deny.
Anyway who is a democrat or votes for democrats is a satanist.
We really need “The Big One” to take out coastal California.
I don't think it's either one or it would hardly have been put in the bill.
The people of California didn’t vote for this, get your head out of the ground
Who will have the legal right to be the murderer? Momma? Daddy? Doctor? Anyone?
What if the murder takes place on the 29th day? Would that make it bad, like really bad?
What a hole we are digging.
that would be bad...
Sacrifice to Molech. Pure freaking evil.
Related
Zeke Emmanuel’s complete lives system
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/04/ezekiel_emmanuels_reaper_curve.html
Somewhere in the Constitution, if the ‘Rats would read it, they will find that no one can be deprived of their life without due process. If they pass this, we should revoke their statehood and return them to territorial status.
But see my tag line.
Molloch is hungry. God hates Molloch. California will burn this year
This crazy crap reminds of the guy that killed the abortionist at his home. He was hiding out in the woods until apprehended. Who is/was that guy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.