Posted on 04/19/2022 5:59:16 AM PDT by SJackson
The murderer of British MP Sir David Amess, Ali Harbi Ali, who’s been described as “0an academic high-flyer” in a headline of the sleazy rag, the Guardian, told the jury in his trial that he was a “moderate Muslim.” This is just the latest reminder that we never really can know which Muslims are going to go jihad before it’s too late. Some Muslims have no history of violence, and then all of a sudden they commit the most heinous acts imaginable. And after these atrocities, Muslims-turned-jihadists can claim that what they did was not only moral, but religiously righteous. And they can even claim that they’re “moderate.”
It’s Muslim Roulette. Even the most “moderate” and “peaceful” Muslims can, out of the blue, commit the most obscene acts of violence, but with no prior warning signs. These Muslims may not act outwardly any different than they have before, but internally, they began to take Islam seriously. And the more serious a Muslim takes Islam, the more potentially dangerous he or she is. Here’s what I mean by Muslim Roulette:
A is A. Islam is Islam. There is no such thing as “Good” Islam or “Bad” Islam. Islam is a totalitarian religion, while Muslims are individual human beings who may or may not practice Islam faithfully. There are active Muslims and passive Muslims, the faithful and the unfaithful, the submitted and the un-submitted in Islam, but there is no obvious way to tell the difference between them, which has its benefits for Muslims who are committed to spreading Islam by any means necessary. Mohammad said “War is deceit” and practiced this, and Muslims have followed their leader in using deception against non-Muslims from the first days of Islam to today. When Islam, the very antithesis of peace, is sold to us by Muslims and their useful idiots as being the very definition of peace, and actually gains traction, that would have made Goebbels blush.
That Islam must be misrepresented by Muslims in order to appear at all appealing to non-Muslims speaks volumes, and its purpose is to make Islam appear harmless until it’s too late. And the Islamic enemy’s major weapon against us is us. From our multiculturalism, which our unicultural enemy exploits, to our crippling political correctness which “protects” us from the truth we need to know and act upon, to our irrational tolerance of the intolerant. The more intolerant they are, the more tolerant we are.
Another weapon that the Islamic enemy uses against us is our desire to believe that “Islam means peace,” no matter what it actually means, no matter what it demands from Muslims, and no matter what Islam’s “perfect model,” Mohammad, leads Islam’s true believers to do.
And then there are those who are moderately Islamic, but who advertise themselves as “Moderate Muslims,” who have hijacked the normatively immoderate Islam, not by admitting and thoroughly repudiating the inherent violence within Islam, but by merely mouthing the words, “Islam means peace,” and again, allowing our desire to believe it to do the rest.
The widespread usage of the term “Moderate Muslim” is a tacit confession of Islam’s immoderate nature. When’s the last time any of you have heard the terms “Moderate Christians,” “Moderate Jews,” “Moderate Hindus,” “Moderate Buddhists”?
And while Muslims are individuals who may or may not be following Islam, most Muslims have shown us that when it comes down to it, the majority of them will side with Islam against the non-Muslim world. They’ve made it clear, in their indifferent silence and inaction in the face of the daily horrors committed by their devout coreligionists, that in the end, they don’t give a damn about anything except Islam and its reputation. I can’t count the number of times that so-called “moderate Muslims,” from teachers to engineers to average, everyday Muslims, have threatened me with the most obscene death threats and rape threats. Many of them won’t act on these threats, but they sure as hell wouldn’t mind, and would even celebrate, if jihadists did act on their threats.
Also, I’ve read one too many accounts of Muslims whose first response to particularly horrific Islamic atrocities was to run to the rescue of Islam, the ideological source of the atrocities. The price we’re paying for denying the truth about what we’re facing is too high. The result of this mass evasion is that the truth about Islam, and any number of truths that we need to expose, is relegated to the underground.
I used to think that it will simply take more death and destruction for the civilized world to accept the truth about Islam before we’re ready to act on our behalf against it, but now I think that those who need even more death and destruction than we already get, with hundreds of people slaughtered weekly in the name of Islam, can’t be reached through reason, or even through being shaken to their core.
Some people, far too many people, can simply live with the mass deaths of others. That’s a damning thing to conclude, but it’s true.
One dead MP is moderate. Six or more is radical. He's moderate and deserves a moderate sentence.
"Moderate" moslems want radical moslems to kill "infidels".
What he fails to address is the fact that while most of the world's major cities have experienced moslem terrorism one most assuredly has not.
That city is Tokyo. And why is Tokyo different? Because Japan doesn't believe in "multiculturalism". Their immigration policies don't allow moslem filth to settle there.They're very much into racial purity,which makes for a peaceful,stable and productive society.
“They’re very much into racial purity”
Islam is not a race. All you have to do to become Muslim is to verbally attest that Allah is the only G-d, and that Muhammed is his net profit. So a Japanese convert to Islam can go on a Jihad killing spree, and still be racially pure, so long as his skin is still yellow and his eyes still slant.
The editors at the sleazy rag might have caught the typo that the editors at Frontpage Magazine did not.
.
And if you study Japan's immigration/citizenship/settlement policies you'll see just how strict they are.
Many “moderates” are a bit of traditionalists, as well. How about a traditional British sentence: hanged, drawn, and quartered.
Hanged, but cut down while alive, then emasculated and disemboweled, then in some way, rendered into four parts.
I guess moderate translates to not.
WHEN WILL THE WORLD WAKE UP???
A moderate Muslim is about like a moderate Democrat. Even the ones that call themselves moderate still want to kill you and destroy your way of life. The only difference between them and the radical ones is how much they want you to suffer while you’re being murdered.
TAQQIYA....the language of a MUSLIM.
And he’s probably correct
The Ku Klux Klan was only ever the “Invisible Empire” because ‘decent’ White people who weren’t radical enough to join still still refused to become actively involved in ending its campaign of terrorism. Regardless whether they did this because they secretly feared retaliation from the Klan if they spoke out, or if they agreed with the its agenda, the KKK’s survival was directly beholden to their silence.
And so it is with the “moderate” Muslim. “Radical” Islam only exists because the Muhammadan community at large permits it to.
Tokyo has it’s own terrorists. Aum Shinrikyo.
He could well be telling the truth. Moderate => middle of the road. If few Moslems are rat-bastids and most are, his being a kinda R-B, puts him sorta in the middle.
Anytime some TWOT tries and say that most Moslems aren’t for violence I think that when Arafat was running for office he regularly got 70’%. Added to that is the videos of R-B’s dancing in the street on 9/11. And, those videos are real, not some urban myth.
Moderate Moslems have a tough sell. Like a Catholic priest that doesn’t diddle kids. It’s no longer enough to not — you have to inform. To not do so is to consent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.