Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New texts show two GOP lawmakers offered advice to Trump’s team on challenging election
thehill ^ | 04/15/22 10:08 AM ET | BY REBECCA BEITSCH

Posted on 04/15/2022 1:04:12 PM PDT by RandFan

Newly revealed text messages from two Republicans who voted to certify President Biden’s election victory show they privately offered advice to Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows in navigating a challenge to the 2020 presidential election.

Texts from Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) obtained by CNN show the two men sought to aid Meadows on how former President Trump should proceed, including in his legal strategy.

The texts show in the early days following the election, both men lended their support to Trump.

Lee texted Meadows on Nov. 7, 2020, to offer his “unequivocal support for you to exhaust every legal and constitutional remedy at your disposal to restore Americans faith in our elections.”

“This fight is about the fundamental fairness and integrity of our election system. The nation is depending upon your continued resolve. Stay strong and keep fighting Mr. President,” he added later.

That same day Roy also sent messages to Meadows.

“We need ammo. We need fraud examples. We need it this weekend,” he said.

On Jan. 6, 2021, both men voted to certify the election results hours after violent rioters pushed their way into the Capitol.

Roy said his vote “may well sign my political death warrant” but added that “the president should never have spun up certain Americans to believe something that simply cannot be.”

Lee offered a similar refrain on the Senate floor: ​​“Our job is a very simple one,” he said. “Our job is to convene to open the ballots and to count them. That’s it.”

But both men also waded into Trump’s legal battles.

Lee lobbied on behalf of Trump lawyer Sydney Powell, sending a text to Meadows, also on Nov. 7, 2020, in an effort to get her into the Oval Office.

“Sydney Powell is saying that she needs to get in to see the president, but she’s being kept away from him,” Lee wrote, sending along her email and phone number.

“Apparently she has a strategy to keep things alive and put several states back in play. Can you help get her in?”

Roy also weighed in that day on the approach Trump should take.

“We must urge the President to tone down the rhetoric, and approach the legal challenge firmly, intelligently and effectively without resorting to throwing wild desperate haymakers or whipping his base into a conspiracy frenzy,” he said.

A representative for Roy told The Hill the texts “speak for themselves.”

Lee Lonsberry, communications director for Lee, said the text messages are consistent with his comments from the Senate chamber.

“The text messages tell the same story Sen. Lee told from the floor of the Senate the day he voted to certify the election results of each and every state in the nation. They tell the story of a US Senator fulfilling his duty to Utah and the American people by following the Constitution,” Lonsberry said.

The texts also showed the men growing more concerned about Trump’s legal efforts as the campaign wore on, including a Nov. 19, 2020, press conference with Powell alongside fellow campaign attorney, Rudy Giuliani, where they laid out a number of conspiracy theories related to election fraud.

Powell, like Meadows, has been subpoenaed by the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol. She is also facing professional repercussions for making baseless claims of election fraud in court.

After the media event, Lee said he was “worried about the Powell press conference.”

“The potential defamation liability for the president is significant here. For the campaign and for the president personally. Unless Powell can back up everything she said, which I kind of doubt she can,” he texted.

Meadows responded that he was also “very concerned.”

The press conference also alarmed Roy.

“Hey brother — we need substance or people are going to break,” the lawmaker wrote.

Later that month, both lawmakers were beginning to rally around John Eastman, who drafted two memos for the Trump campaign outlining how to unwind the election by having former Vice President Mike Pence reject the Electoral College certification.

In a civil suit spurred by Eastman seeking to block the Jan. 6 panel from accessing his records, a judge found he and Trump likely committed a crime in their efforts to block the certification, calling it “a coup in search of a legal theory.”

Privately, Roy was also texting Meadows with support for Eastman and criticizing Giuliani.

“Have you talked to John Eastman?” Roy wrote to Meadows on Nov. 22, 2020.

“Get Eastman to file in front of pa board of elections…Get data in front of public domain.”

“Frigging rudy needs to hush,” he added, taking a dig at Giuliani.

But by December, each started to express more serious reservations with the campaign.

“If you want senators to object, we need to hear from you on that ideally getting some guidance on what arguments to raise,” Lee wrote on Dec. 16.

“I think we’re now passed the point where we can expect anyone will do it without some direction and a strong evidentiary argument.”

And on New Year’s Eve, Roy suggested abandoning the effort entirely.

“The president should call everyone off. It’s the only path. If we substitute the will of states through electors with a vote by congress every 4 years… we have destroyed the electoral college… Respectfully,” the Texas congressman wrote.

On Jan. 3, Lee similarly expressed concern over an illegal plan to send an alternate slate of state electors to Congress.

“I only know that this will end badly for the President unless we have the Constitution on our side,” Lee texted.

“And unless these states submit new slates of Trump electors pursuant to state law, we do not,” he said.

As the violence unfolded on Jan. 6, Roy again reached out to Meadows.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2022 1:04:13 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This is a problem why?


2 posted on 04/15/2022 1:07:48 PM PDT by blackdog (Today's "disinformation" most often turns out to be tomorrow's facts. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

What’s funny is they think it’s a bad thing to oppose their criminality.

Real criminals always feel that way. They’re convinced they have a right to commit their crimes, and are totally bewidered when they meet resistance.


3 posted on 04/15/2022 1:09:36 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

not a problem I should have added well done Mike Lee 👏👏


4 posted on 04/15/2022 1:10:12 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

They both still voted to certify on January 6.


5 posted on 04/15/2022 1:10:19 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Boom!


6 posted on 04/15/2022 1:11:01 PM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Why are private text messages being forwarded to CNN? Who is intercepting these messages?


7 posted on 04/15/2022 1:11:19 PM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

THEN THEY BOTH VOTED TO CERTIFY THE ELECTION!

HYPOCRITE, is totally inadequate to describe them...and most politicians regardless of gang colors.

HAPPY HOLY DAYS TO ALL!


8 posted on 04/15/2022 1:12:08 PM PDT by TigerHawk (The Raised Middle Finger in the Clenched Fist of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Not illegal to look at how election results can be legally and constitutionally challenged. The Dims seem to be trying to criminalize merely considering challenging election results. Would they turn around now and tell Al Gore to just go home and forget it???

Nixon and his team did in 1960, and decided not to pursue what legal chanllenges were available.


9 posted on 04/15/2022 1:13:01 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I’m guessing there was a lot of pressure behind the scenes


10 posted on 04/15/2022 1:13:26 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I am thinking the same way, so what?

It would be one thing if they were plotting to blow up the Capitol or something but they aren’t.


11 posted on 04/15/2022 1:13:26 PM PDT by DMD13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
Texts from Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) obtained by CNN show the two men sought to aid Meadows on how former President Trump should proceed, including in his legal strategy.

And the problem is?
Didn't Al Gore challenge the Bush victory in 2000 all the way to the US Supreme Court and would have taken it even further if possible? And Dems thought it was great?

12 posted on 04/15/2022 1:20:09 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Liz Cheney?


13 posted on 04/15/2022 1:21:48 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

So?


14 posted on 04/15/2022 1:27:36 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
On Jan. 6, 2021, both men voted to certify the election results

Spit*

15 posted on 04/15/2022 1:35:15 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
This is like a Nazi concentration camp or communist gulag guard that on the side wants to give you good advice because he really doesn't agree with the regime. He'll load you on the train to Auschwitz or pull the trigger while standing on the execution line anyhow - but at least he gave you some “good advice.”

Gee thanks.

Advice to them: you cannot be moral without courage.

16 posted on 04/15/2022 1:50:30 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
This is a problem why?

Because it violates the 4th and 1st Amendments. Democrats can't have folks exercising their rights so, yes, it's a proboem, all this freedom.

17 posted on 04/15/2022 1:52:43 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (GoFundMe is a Democrat Scam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Dear libtards. We don’t care.


18 posted on 04/15/2022 1:53:39 PM PDT by trailboss800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Can we expect messages regarding Clinton’s challenge to the election of 2016 including messages attempting to get Electors to not vote for Trump to be released any time soon? How about Gore’s challenge to the 2001 election?


19 posted on 04/15/2022 2:10:34 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Yes very good point. The Beltway made its appointment clear. The meek got in line. I pray they suffer a terrible price for their half measured principles.


20 posted on 04/15/2022 2:18:30 PM PDT by blackdog (Today's "disinformation" most often turns out to be tomorrow's facts. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson