Posted on 04/12/2022 11:09:11 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
A critical Danish study published last week in The Lancet examined the possible non-specific effects (NSEs) of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. The study suggests that traditional adenovirus-based vaccines such as Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca may be safer for overall mortality—including COVID-19 deaths, accidental deaths and cardiovascular deaths—than the experimental mRNA-based “vaccines” manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna. The preprint, titled “Randomised Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Vaccines: Do Adenovirus-Vector Vaccines Have Beneficial Non-Specific Effects?,” notes:
“Given the public health importance, we used the final study reports currently available from the clinical testing to examine the impact of mRNA and adenovirus-vector vaccines on overall mortality, including COVID-19-related mortality, accidents, cardiovascular deaths and other non-COVID-19 mortality.”
After reviewing the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for the four vaccine candidates, the April 5, 2022 preprint reports that for overall mortality, with 74,193 participants and 61 deaths (mRNA:31; placebo:30), the relative risk (RR) for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA “vaccines” compared with the placebo was 1.03. Comparatively, in the adenovirus-based vaccines there were 122,164 participants and 46 deaths (vaccine:16; controls:30). The RR for the adenovirus-based vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca) versus the placebo/control vaccine was 0.37. The study notes that the adenovirus-based vaccines also demonstrated protection against COVID-19 deaths (RR=0.11), non-accident and non-COVID-19 deaths (RR=0.38). Nonetheless, as illustrated in the table below, the two types of vaccines were significantly different with respect to an impact on overall mortality.
(Excerpt) Read more at uncoverdc.com ...
Well, neither type of vaccine actually works, so who cares which is “safer”?
here’s the complete pre-print article (not ACTUALLY published in The Lancet nor necessarily ever will be):
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489
“Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are EARLY STAGE research papers that have not been peer-reviewed.”
So glad I got the AstraZeneca... Alive so far.
Good point... 3+1 booster, + another booster = zero chance of preventing you from getting Covid, or from passing it on to others.
What was the point of getting the vaccines again?
Because you can haughtily snort your a follower of science! Of course they don’t tell you it’s political science they are actually following, not real science. But these followers feel really good about themselves, knowing they are smarter than those who refused to take the jab, well those who are still alive and not under medical care because of the jab.
My son had to get the jab to take a job.
He got the J&J.
Myself, my wife, daughter and most of my family are still pure bloods.
bkmk
I know two people who took the J&J and have come down with Gillian Barre syndrome. One has had it attack him, recover and then months later attack him again. He currently cannot walk. But as the FR proselytizers would say they a statistical anomaly and the good of these jabs justifies their being struck down because they are safe and effective! Right...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.