Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MAGA2017

I think that’s a square less than 4 miles per side.


9 posted on 04/09/2022 11:30:29 PM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ComputerGuy
I think that’s a square less than 4 miles per side.

Correct!

640 acres per sq. mile.

10,000 divided by 640 = approx. 16 sq. miles = a square four miles by four miles.

Regards,

17 posted on 04/10/2022 2:40:20 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ComputerGuy

I think that’s a square less than 4 miles per side.

10,000 acres = 15.6 sq miles. Small timber companies own more than that.

Near by are the Olympic National Forest = 628,115 acre (which borders) and the Olympic National Park = 922,650 acres

or
1,550,765 acres or 2,423 sq miles

There is some (or was) logging in the ONF and none in the ONP (not even blow downs). Quite a “carbon sink”.


23 posted on 04/10/2022 4:14:46 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ComputerGuy

640 acres per square mile. IIRC, they used to call that a ‘section.’ So 10,000 acres would be a little over 15 square miles if I did my math correctly.


32 posted on 04/10/2022 6:03:54 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson