Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why an ISIS Propagandist Abandoned Islam
Atlantic ^ | March 2022

Posted on 04/06/2022 9:18:17 PM PDT by Cronos

...In prison, he began to study the Quran in greater detail, and focused on the aspects that most puzzled him. Among these was the figure called Dhu-l Qarnayn, “the two-horned one,” who appears in the Quran’s 18th chapter and is believed by many to refer to Alexander the Great. Cerantonio did not see a resemblance between Dhu-l Qarnayn and the Alexander of history—but he noted similarities between Dhu-l Qarnayn and a heavily fabulized version of Alexander’s story written in Aramaic. He considered that the Aramaic version may have plagiarized the Quran, but after acquiring a copy of the Aramaic and translating it for himself, he determined that the reverse was more likely. (“I always knew that being proficient in Aramaic would one day prove useful.”)

...

Realizing that Dhu-l Qarnayn was not at all a real person but was rather based on a fictional account of Alexander the Great instantly left me with only one possible conclusion: The Quran was not divinely inspired,” he wrote. It had taken Alexander the Great fan fiction as fact. “Of course I would have preferred to have discovered all that 17 years ago and avoided much trouble.” He has therefore abandoned not only ISIS but Islam

...

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alexanderthegreat; aramaic; dhulqarnayn; isis; koran; quran

1 posted on 04/06/2022 9:18:17 PM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Wow. Good for him. Not too many inquisitive, questioning minds in islam that would admit to coming to this conclusion and leaving it. Much less by a muslim so deeply ingrained hes in ISIS.


2 posted on 04/06/2022 9:21:04 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Most Mormons never come to the obvious conclusion that the Book of Mormon is totally fictitious. Some years ago I pointed out to a Mormon Freeper that not a single archaeological discovery had ever verified anything in it. His answer was something like “archaeology is always changing”, which is totally untrue and kind of ridiculous answer. I assume that is a standard mindless answer Mormons give.


3 posted on 04/06/2022 9:35:02 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Not too many inquisitive, questioning minds in islam >>> That happens when all the guys marry their sisters after a couple of generations.


4 posted on 04/06/2022 10:05:52 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Mormons must go with “Don’t look too close, Don’t think too hard”. Certainly would explain Romney.


5 posted on 04/06/2022 10:08:48 PM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis Deplorable STILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

A lot of Aramaic sourced stuff in the Quran. Of course wikipedia includes criticism in its ‘responses’

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christoph_Luxenberg


6 posted on 04/06/2022 11:04:16 PM PDT by Long Jon No Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Thanks for posting. Bookmark.


7 posted on 04/07/2022 1:56:01 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Stuck Mojo - For the Cause of Allah

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uB0VdBmT3Gw&list=OLAK5uy_n3d_UfkTUkYnKOUh3JlUBnFJdyYPGkR-I&index=80


8 posted on 04/07/2022 2:13:08 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Jon No Silver

Anyone can edit wikipedia. I edit articles - but you don’t even need to be registered.

There is criticism of Luxenburg, but in my amateur historian opinion, this is unwarranted.

There are two aspect to the Aramaic in the Quran (there are also a few Farsi words)

1. Deflating the “Arabic is a holy language” point - many, if not most Mohammedans think that Arabic is the language of Allah. So telling them that it is an evolution of Nabataen is disconcerting.

2. More critical is the fact that the Quranic text reads better in Syriac than in Arabic indicates that the Quran was created. To nearly all Mohammedans the Quran occupies the place of Jesus in Christianity - i.e. they hold the Quran as uncreated and existing before all time and the literal words of Allah. Saying it was created is soul crushing - note that this is analogous to some Christian sects who consider the Bible to be dictated by God and some Jewish sects who consider the Torah to be the dictated words of God


9 posted on 04/07/2022 2:33:08 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Interesting article. Thx for posting.


10 posted on 04/07/2022 3:02:06 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Great post.

For people who like a podcast style of learning, for this topic, see CIRA International and also Pfander Films and also also Thomas Alexander (from Germany) on YouTube.


11 posted on 04/07/2022 4:06:32 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

.


12 posted on 04/07/2022 4:17:10 AM PDT by sauropod (So may we start? It's time to start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Jon No Silver
Until the rise of Islam Aramaic was the Lingua Franca of western Asia.

CC

13 posted on 04/07/2022 4:56:14 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Islam is in dire need of a Reformation and someone brave enough to nail their 95 theses to the mosque door.


14 posted on 04/07/2022 9:29:04 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Islam has had its reformation in 1790. That’s when Al Wahhab and his Salafis tried to bring Islam back to its original form.

We see his descendents today as the Wahhabis namely the Saudis, Taliban and Islamic state. Those are the reformers of Islam


15 posted on 04/07/2022 10:06:26 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


16 posted on 01/07/2024 11:22:41 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Politics do not make strange bedfellows, and the enemy of your enemy may still be your enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson