[roving]

The NY Times? When is the last time they were an honest broker? Seriously, point us to any article over the last 4-5 years that was truthful?
________________________

Here we go. Everything is a lie unless It’s something a pro-Putin posts it

[JonPreston]

Your turn. Point us to any NY Times article over the last 4-5 years that was truthful?

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Weeks ago, the prediction by the pro-Puting crowd was that Kyiv was going to fall any day, that the Ukrainians had no organized military units left, etc..

So did they take it, or not? Because if not, that means they failed, and are in retreat. There's no other alternative if if you also accept the premise that the Russian were attempting to take Kyiv.

Again, no propaganda or mainstream news source is even necessary to understand one core truth - the Russians did not have enough troops allocated to this attack if the Ukrainians didn't fall apart under the initial assault. Anyone who is honest and understands modern warfare knows that.