[DoodleDawg]

Not surprising.

[dfwgator]

And that’s that.

[kiryandil]

I was leaving this alone, but saw today that Brown Jackson refused to say if she holds a position on whether individuals have natural rights.

[TornadoAlley3]

What is Mr Delecto’s polling numbers in Utah?

[conservative98]

Predictable and shameful.

[duckman]

I know what Mitten’s problem is, is it that time of the month for Lisa? Askin for a female friend.

[Sacajaweau]

Well....Duh...

[ConservativeInPA]

Big surprise. There is a special place in hell for them.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Assistant Democrats will always assist the Democrats.

But just keep voting for the R

No matter how bad they are

Rah Rah Romney

Hail Hail Haley

[JoSixChip]

I think that murkowski knows she is done, if the vote is fair. So she ether has nothing to lose, or she knows the fix is in. As for romney, well he is just a rino ass. Same as it ever was.

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Does this mean Mormons had multiple wives in order to have more children to molest?

[Secret Agent Man]

Uniparty is gonna uniparty.

We’re on our own folks. No one represents us.

[ronnie raygun]

of coarse they do a## and underwear

[Republican Wildcat]

Murkowski has decided the only way she can win is to cast her lot with the Democrat base in Alaska.

And I assume Romney decided he isn’t going to run for re-election.

[dfwgator]

Thanks, Utah.

[petitfour]

This is what happens when the people elect delusional nuts who do not believe in God.

[Az Joe]

Romney runnin for prez in ‘24. He’s courtin’ the RINO vote.

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

Yep BUT voting for the lesser of two evil is just SO MUCH BETTER, SPIT, this is and will continue to be OUR OWN FAULT!!! These RINOS are NOT the lesser of two evil, so those of you on this board that continue to vote this way SPIT!!!!

[Retain Mike]

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention found their motivation for scrutinizing proposals from political theories of the Enlightenment that emphasized individual human liberties synthesized into intangible property as defined most immediately by John Locke, and James Madison. For all time Americans then would be defined as sovereign individuals finding their identity in exercising pre-existing intangible liberties within bounds of voluntary self-restraint and accompanied by the hazards and uncertainties of personal freedom.

However, Judge Jackson disagrees with that position as noted in the below article. In her defense many say that “natural rights” are a religious and not a legal principle.

'I Do Not Hold a Position on Whether Individuals Possess Natural Rights'

https://www.cnsnews.com/article/national/susan-jones/judge-jackson-i-do-not-hold-position-whether-individuals-possess

The links I have listed refute that idea. Also, the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights says, “the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. The Soviet Union ensured any taint of religion was removed before the document was adopted.

Constitution Society: John Locke CHAP. V Of Property.

http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr05.htm

Property by James Madison

http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/property-by-james-madison-march-29-1792.html

Everything I have said above now represents a highly controversial political position. We are now only one opinion away from forfeiting our liberties as previously delineated, when five individuals such as this judge can redefine our Constitution.

[AAABEST]

Romney may not be gettable, but that miserable wench Murkowski certainly is.

She must be taken out at ALL costs.

[Dan in Wichita]

Actually, this is good news...

Jackson is going to be approved regardless of what any Republican does.

By voting for this stone-cold Marxist, Murkowski and Pierre Delecto have made themselves easier to defeat in the primary.