I'm curious.
How is it that you think websites pay for bandwidth?
80% of Fox News' advertising revenue comes from drug companies.
Without it, they'd be out of business. That's why they have been completely silent on vaccine adverse reactions. Roger Ailes admitted it before he died.
But you begrudge a little news site that tries to provide actual news what little advertising revenue they can scrounge up.
I guess you'd prefer getting all your news from store-bought sources like Fox News because it's so low-class to advertise survival food instead of drugs?
“How is it that you think websites pay for bandwidth?80% of Fox News’ advertising revenue comes from drug companies.
Without it, they’d be out of business. That’s why they have been completely silent on vaccine adverse reactions. Roger Ailes admitted it before he died. But you begrudge a little news site that tries to provide actual news what little advertising revenue they can scrounge up. I guess you’d prefer getting all your news from store-bought sources like Fox News because it’s so low-class to advertise survival food instead of drugs?”
The man merely pointed out the OBVIOUS. The site posts a Doom and Gloom article and their sponsor is Prepper Survival products. You don’t need to be a Rocket Surgeon to add 1+1 and conclude the answer is 2. The fact that you ignored this OBVIOUS relationship says far more about you than the poster you chastised.