You get a scratch-off “ballot” (again, based on the same technology as a lottery scratch-off ticket) from any retail store, scratch it, and scan the QR code underneath with your phone (you can also enter the info into your home computer browser).
When voting is closed, the secretary of State applies a decryption key to the repository and tallies the votes in seconds. She/he can give the key to anyone who wants to see the results (including voters). The tallies can’t be altered.
The public instantly knows how many votes each candidate received.
Redo Voting co-founder and president John Rogers was asked about security. Isn’t everything hackable, including the Redo Voting system?
“Technically, yes,” Rogers told me, “but it would take all the computing power of a modern nation-state and roughly five billion years to do it.”
On line voting?
No thanks.
It’s a con job.
My 83 year old mother has no cell phone, no desktop, and no interest in either.
Bookmark
not buying it for a second
and I’ve done more election integrity work than anyone else
unfortunately EI has become just another playground for profit-seeking
23 March: FrankSpeech: Mike Lindell: Bombshell Proof Of Election Machine Manipulation
https://frankspeech.com/article/bombshell-proof-election-machine-manipulation
23 March: FrankSpeech: Mike Lindell: Bombshell Proof Of Election Machine Manipulation
https://frankspeech.com/article/bombshell-proof-election-machine-manipulation
What a weird statement that is on the Redo website. Seems a bit at odds with all that "transparency".
In any case most of us spend and sometimes receive significant amounts of money via the Internet, and we do so securely with rare exceptions these days. We trade stocks and do our banking online with passwords protected by encryption.
We can/will vote online just as securely, and with real-time transparency. The software itself will be completely open source and audited by every skeptic who cares to look.
The precinct database of encoded ballots and running tallies will be an online spreadsheet which anyone can download and analyze for themselves at any time during or after the election. Each electronic ballot will have a serial number and will be displayed in the spreadsheet by serial number, so each voter will be able to find his particular ballot row in the spreadsheet and verify the votes were recorded properly across the columns of individual races/questions. The confidential index file which connects each serialized ballot to a registered voter will be the only non-transparent aspect, but it will be queryable at the order of a court with jurisdiction.
This part is important: You will not be able to prove how you voted to any third party without that proof including information traceable back to you (via the confidential index file), and that is good because it discourages vote selling.
This part is really important and it’s only possible if the election database has granularity down to each ballot, like a spreadsheet would: If it’s determined later that some of the ballots were bogus for whatever reason, those ballots can be transparently removed from the precinct spreadsheet and whatever damage they inflicted on the election disappears with them.
Online voting should be an option ASAP. I suspect it will become very popular especially if it's implemented correctly so that shenanigans are virtually impossible.
Any Affinity bulk mail that in appearance resembles a ballot should be outlawed.
This voting system requires a web browser, therefore it’s racist. /s
The Democrats will be working overtime to find an excuse to declare it racist.
You’d need to be able to verify that there are only bona-fide residents in the database. Auditing that would have to be a priority.
The only verification I want implemented is to dip your finger in ink after handing in your ballot.
Even when liberals vote in person they’re absentee.
Online anything is subject to hacking.
https://redovoting.com/redo-voting-faqs/
Even they have their doubts.
Q: What about the elderly who have no access to technology?
A: You raise an important question. Although Redo Voting does provide more universal and complete voter access than any election system in existence, there are some people, like the elderly with technology access challenges, who will need additional assistance.
Q: This system sounds incredible. Is there not any way to beat it?
A: Actually, there is a way. As mentioned before, Redo Voting is compatible with any voting system currently in use. If combined with a system that does not have an unbreakable, fully auditable chain of custody, however, there is the potential for someone to vote on the insecure system before voting on the Redo Voting system without being detected. For unassailably accurate, trustworthy results, use of the Redo Voting system alone is recommended.
Just use machines made from common components(no modems or wifi) and use Open Source software. Machine prints the ballot, voter checks it and slides it into a lock box. Votes are tallied electronically for speed but there’s a paper backup.
Tucker just the special council guy from WI on his Tucker Carlson Today show. Very eye opening, nauseating hour. Zuckerberg bought the election and had lots of helpful minions in and out of government to help. Repub state legislators were useless at best and complicit at worst.
Hopefully someone will upload it to bitchute because everyone needs to see it. Here’s the website with his reports. https://www.wielectionreview.org/
What prevents fraudulent voter registration? What prevents voting for others?
Voting should require a government issued photo ID. You can’t buy beer without photo ID, so don’t tell me that it is an unreasonable barrier to voting.
When you vote we do the hand stamp like at the pub. You can’t vote again if you have a stamp, and it is hard to wash off. If I am willing to get stamped at the pub on St.Pat’s day it isn’t a big deal.
And the time to vote must be 30 minutes or less. We pay people to run the polling stations. I am paying these people. I expect them to be competent. If you can’t manage the voting process and have sufficient resources to manage the number of voters we will fire you and hire someone who can do the job.
I have a better idea. Vote by county. County with the most votes for a candidate gets 1 point. Most points in the state gets the electoral vote. This way the firewall is at the county level. For example, let’s say California has 58 counties and Democrats win 25 of them by 25 million votes or 125% of the registered voters. Since 33 counties will go for the Republican, California’s electoral votes will go to the Republican candidate.
Vote as many times as you like. Fact of the matter is the cheating doesn’t extend beyond the county level. It will meet all Democrat criteria for 1 person 1 vote.
Propose this in congress and what the Democrats howl as they are hoisted on their own petard. For the Senate, it’s the same thing. For the house, it’s by district so who cares.
That’s how you fight a war.