To: struggle
Agree, no value to them in targeting actual civilians.
5 posted on
03/16/2022 11:03:19 AM PDT by
BobL
(I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart, I just don't tell anyone.)
To: BobL
I’d think that targeting civilians would have negative value. A waste of ammo and more grist for the neocon propaganda machine.
11 posted on
03/16/2022 11:06:17 AM PDT by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: BobL
>> Agree, no value to them in targeting actual civilians. <<
“Surrender or else?” Putin threatened nuclear war. He seems interested in acquiring the existing infrastructure, but he’s not above targeting civilians.
24 posted on
03/16/2022 11:12:29 AM PDT by
dangus
To: BobL
Agree, no value to them in targeting actual civilians. Just like there was no value to us targeting Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
57 posted on
03/16/2022 11:29:13 AM PDT by
null and void
(Just because I speak English does not make me a Subject of the English Crown)
To: BobL
Agree, no value to them in targeting actual civilians. Sure there is.
Worth a shot to the Russians, right? Doesn't really cost anything but innocent Ukrainian lives, which hold no value to Putin or to Russia.
To: BobL
“Agree, no value to them in targeting actual civilians.”
The citizens of Aleppo were not available for comment.
173 posted on
03/16/2022 2:06:33 PM PDT by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson