Posted on 02/16/2022 8:52:24 AM PST by BusterDog
Right-wing media outlets like Fox News and the Washington Examiner are pushing a narrative that the Hillary Clinton campaign tried to “infiltrate” and hack Donald Trump and his presidential campaign in 2016.
Trump has picked up on this, saying the people responsible for this deserve to be punished by death. Fox News host Tucker Carlson seized on the story in his show Tuesday night as a way to prove that Trump was right all along in his claims that Hillary Clinton was spying on his campaign, and that Rodney Joffe, an executive at tech company Neustar, intercepted internet traffic including emails and text messages.
This is all being called the "Durham Filing" by right-leaning news outlets and politicians, and is, like many other scandals in this saga, being decried as the biggest political scandal of all time that the left-wing media is ignoring in an attempt to bury the truth. Taking these arguments in good faith, this narrative is still based on a misunderstanding of how the tech involved in this alleged scandal actually works, according to cybersecurity experts.
(Excerpt) Read more at vice.com ...
Denial - not a river in Egypt
Bkmrk for later.
No, Hillary Clinton Did Not ‘Infiltrate’ or Hack Donald Trump, DEEP STATE “Experts” Say
No, Hillary Clinton Did Not ‘Infiltrate’ or Hack Donald Trump, Experts Say
With the Clintons you have to parse what is written.
The above sentence is 100% true. Hillary Clinton herself did not “infiltrate” ...
She paid other to do so.
I’m not ‘in tech’ but I can assure you... hacking into the White House computer systems and using the resulting information to smear the President in the media is absolutely normal... in fact, everyone does it... believe me!
When you are once again proven wrong in a court of law, and there are convictions and sentences to substantiate the truth, will you then issue a retraction?
Just like they aren’t supplying crack pipes - they’re funding outside groups to provide ‘safe smoking’ materials.
It’s very simple, the headline ends with “experts say” and defends and exonerates Hillary Clinton. Who with half a brain needs any more than that to know it’s complete BS?
...with a cloth...
Expert: former spurt under pressure.
Unnamed “experts” should be ignored each and every time they make a “proclamation”.
Espionage is now a nothing burger. This is probably true. Certainly HC will never be blamed. She didn’t know. You can’t prove she did. And she can’t resign in disgrace because she’s not holding office for which we are all thankful...and because she has no disgrace receptors in her brain.
“hacking into the White House computer systems”
****
Vice is saying that didn’t happen.
Bingo!
This tactic is known as “getting ahead of the story”.
Thank God we have “experts” to correct those pesky little, politically motivated, wrong-headed, right-wing conspiracy theory-touting government investigators.
No need to, they are lying, plain an simple.
The article only references to “experts” who have seen nothing and uses phrases like “the data was almost certainly from” Obviously written in a way to imply strongly it is nothing but cannot be held to any accountability.
Almost certainly means absolute NOTHING in any written text. No one can use that statement to any standard, that is how a propagandist writes.
The “experts” have spoken.
How dare you question them, citizen?
By the way, where are your papers?
When they bring in the fag-checkers, they’re worried.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.