Establishment Media Knock Durham Filings That Alleged Clinton Associates Spied On Trump

Breitbart ^ | 2-15-2022 | by Wendell Husebø

[NWFree]

Clean up on isle 9 - fat toad made another mess 🤪

[frank ballenger]

When was the last time they had the respect of the public for their integrity?

[dragnet2]

After more than 48 hours since Durham’s court filing revelations were reported, the New York Times and Washington Post finally wrote articles on the subject

But I read the media would never report this! How is this possible?☺

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Establishment Media, Without Evidence, Knock Durham Filings That Alleged Clinton Associates Spied On Trump

Fixed it.

[Lurkinanloomin]

This is the job of the Ministry of Propaganda.

They are paid to create an alternative reality.

[hoe_cake]

sigh...word salad. Trying to head off a really big problem.

[hoe_cake]

‘... and claimed the “alarmist” narrative highlights “the challenge for journalists in deciding what merits coverage” ‘

I am suspicious of most journalists right now. And my suspicion is merited.

[Luke21]

Real simple. They have done it this way since Ken Starr. Investigation of Republicans good. Investigations of Democrats bad. Previously, Archibald Cox, Leon Jaworski, and Lawrence Walsh were all crime fighting superheroes attacking GOP presidents.

[Golden Eagle]

The Post published an “analysis” article Monday afternoon that claimed there is no evidence “Trump Tower was ‘wiretapped,'” and avoided making a clear connection between Hillary Clinton’s campaign and her associates that allegedly spied on Trump

The timelines of the Steele Dossier, which led to the since exposed FISA warrants on Page and Papodopoluos, along with the law which allows FISA warrant “wiretapping” to extend to anyone in contact with those being specifically targeted, have made it extremely likely that Trump himself was spied on while his campaign headquarters was hosted in Trump tower.

I believe this is where Durham’s investigation SHOULD haven gotten by now, and this recent excursion into DNS data is interesting, but not crucial as the actual spying that was being done, was already well underway by that time courtesy of the Steele dossier, whose details and importance are being forgotten in these new discussions. Is that by design, one has to wonder.

[heshtesh]

I have to wonder what admiral Mike Rogers opinion would be on all this?

[kiryandil]

We’re going to get to watch some Brandon Media ballet as they dance through this little minefield...

[The Antiyuppie]

There is a blessing in here. These difficult questions finally got Hillary to STFU.

[SaveFerris]

Hillary dindu nuffin!!

[AnthonySoprano]

.
Well, the Reporting, outside Fox, was the Trumpers are excited over nothing, and they don’t understand.

I think the NYT was like - Conservatives excited over nothing. “Narrative” and Byzantine reporting is wrong and old news.

[Political Junkie Too]

I thought our LAAP-dog media were experts in immunology.

What Holiday Inn Express did they stay in last night that they are now expert special prosecutors?

-PJ

[palmer]

We all knew about the abuse of FISA for the government wiretapping. I always assumed Trump was talking about that. But now we know the wiretap predicate is Hillary's oppo research. We also now know the Horowitz investigation of the FISA process was a coverup.

What came out last weekend was the potential for private wiretapping. Monitoring DNS lookups is legal, selling them is unethical but legal, but selling them to the opposition party seems to be way over the line. It is speculation, but controlling the DNS also allows connection hijacking, clearly illegal form of a private wiretap.

[V V Camp Enari 67-68]

The hard evidence will come later, as in indictments.

[V V Camp Enari 67-68]

The hard evidence will come later, as in indictments.

[Jeff Chandler]

But I read the media would never report this! How is this possible?☺

Is that a slap at Freepers?