>>> So what is the standard for cognitive disfunction that precludes an incumbent from holding office?
I guess I don’t understand your question.
If I re-state my point, maybe you can re-ask it appropriately...
In response to the thread title, I’m saying that these 38 lawmakers who are now questioning the cognitive abilities of Biden should have taken that into consideration on Jan 6... because they knew then what they know now.
Otherwise, the more obvious conclusion about HOW our presidents are SELECTED reveals itself for everyone to see.
How much more “IN YOUR FACE” does it get when the enemies of freedom are able to install a brainless senile pedophile OVER the most popular president in American history???
Biden even publicly bragged about how he was going to get into office, and it still happened with virtually NO OPPOSITION from EVEN THE GOP to stop the steal.
THESE GOP BASTARDS MAKE ME SICK in congress every time I hear them complain about Biden and what he is doing.
They are Gutless COWARDS if you ask me.
They sold this country out lock stock and barrel, and now they are trying to play the hero, when most of us know now that even Trump was a plant.
There... I said it.
I wasn’t referring to political standards for removing a POTUS. My question was what is the medical standard that would have to be met to declare someone incopotsemento and therefore not fit for duty. I am sure there is a standard in the military to remove someone but a POTUS? We have had previous presidents in a less media hyped world get away with not fit for duty but today? It would be interesting and Jill would probably make the call.