Posted on 02/10/2022 11:51:24 AM PST by Salman
And the Chinese, Iranians, Iraqis, Europeans, Canadians, Mexicans, and even Jamaicans.
What about the ability to actually fight and win wars?
How did all that “diversity” work out in Afghanistan?
The objective competency measures have already been all but dismantled. Womyn can't compete on the same level as men so even the handicap scores have been ignored when they can't be met. Want one of these watching your back in a combat environment?
Ping
>Bishop Garrison, the senior advisor to the secretary of defense for human capital and diversity, equity and inclusion
Well isn’t that just a fabulous title. Nice and woke position
"It's not just something that has to be done because of some type of cultural ideology or culture wars that are going on — that's not the case at all. It is, again, not diversity for diversity's sake," Garrison said.
Utter BS.
human capital
\/
Wow
IOW
Slaves without God given rights.
.
No..the military needs to train people to shoot, follow orders. and stand up to Protect the USA.
A lot of very fine young men are going to be leaving. Army life is difficult enough, but constant deployments and over use makes it very difficult. My SIN law calls the 82nd, 101st and 10th Mt Div a dead end. It kills families and careers. Politics are rampant and it is difficult for an old school soldier to get ahead. Just add this diversity, equity and inclusion BS and it is even worse. My understanding from my SIN that his fellow soldiers are from all kinds of background, and the vast majority do not have any issues with race or ethnic background. So there isn't a diversity problem or whatever you want to call it.
Abstractly, there is a training and readiness problem. Every moment spent on diversity training is a moment not spent doing their daily jobs or not training to kill and break things. It is a waste of money and reduces readiness. It makes America weak.
They misspelled “perversity”.
“Diversity, equity and inclusion”
I thought it was “Kill Our Enemies and Break Things”
I had the same thought in the past. Just don't give them any armor. See what it is like to walk down in the street in a place like Fallujah.
So NATIONAL DEFENSE is of secondary importance to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion?
I’d like to hear him explain why “equity” was chosen instead of “equality.”
If the “woke” military ever goes to battle it might end up like the French did after WWII and their sale of military hardware ... For sale: French Army Rifles. Never fired. Only dropped once.
“Equity” is only possible if all the troops are dead.
The military “leaders” are pushing Kool-Aid to cult followers.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Are Necessities in U.S. Military (this is an official DoD press release)
—
Kill, Destroy at Speed, Overwhelming Artillery Fire, Mass Mechanized Charge - whatever it takes to subdue the enemy - Kill, Kill, Kill, No retreat: Russian Military doctrine.
Compare and contrast for extra points.
It is a waste of money and reduces readiness. It makes America weak.
—
Since the end of WWII ...
If the “woke” military ever goes to battle against Russian forces - there is no plan, no training on how to fight a long sustained war. There would be a wake up call as body bags returned home in the thousands (if the planes carrying the bodies were not shot down).
“A war with Russia would be unlike anything the US and NATO have ever experienced” by Scott Ritter
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56987.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.