Posted on 02/05/2022 3:43:54 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
And the gun grabbers celebrate.
Funny thing about that deal in Texas though. The church did have a security team in place and one of them did in fact take the killer out with one round from his .357 SIG, but you know what?
That killer walked right thru that security team into the sanctuary, wearing an overcoat on a hot summer day, with a shotgun concealed under it.
“Oh, Mister Smith, nice to see you today, here, you don’t mind if we all just kinda hold you up right here and help you with your coat...”
Good thing that Plan B worked out for them but Plan A would have been better.
LOTS of Mexican gangs in Aurora, CO.
Lol. Thats funny
Aurora, like Denver, has among the strictest gun control laws in the state, I think including an AWB and some other limitations, that aren’t anywhere else in the state except Denver, and maybe a very few other places.
More than that. Aurora isn’t happy unless they are having a shootout. This is like the third or fourth one. The theater one was quite some time ago.
Aug-Dec ‘81.
Your point is what? That most are not white, or disproportional?
Fine, with that extremely simplistic definition.
True mass incident involves INTENT to kill RANDOM people en masse. (It could be specific group, like church, or synagogue, but basically they’re not targeting specific named individuals.)
Most of the blacks are common thugs who carelessly let anyone get caught in the crossfire, cannot shoot worth a damn, or perhaps all 4 of their intended specific victims were together that they could kill at once.
Have I done exhaustive study? No. But most stories of mass incidents involve whites (though more diverse the last decade). Most we’ve all been aware of (BECAUSE they might be true mass crimes) are whites.
Further, you KNOW there weren’t some 100 “mass incidents” - TRUE - in one year.
Wow,
I lived in Aurora and Lone Tree from 1983 to 1993.
The area must really have changed or else I was not paying attention. Of course, 29 years is time enough for the bad characters to plant themselves in those towns.
You a Fire Control type?
As defined by 4 or more shot in one incident, yes there was.
It’s not my fault inner city trash are terrible shots.
It’s not killing 4 or more, but shooting 4 or more.
Suburban white nut jobs are just better shots…
321X2P. WCS, F-4C/D
I stated mass INCIDENTS, not mass murder, though that’s the usual concern.
Again, it HAS to be separated by the INTENTION.
Don’t tell me Jamal stupidly carelessly “targeting” Jon’Qito is the same as the Newtown shooting.
Targeted, vs. random carpet-spraying.
I just don’t like disingenuous statistics.
Da’Quan of the Crips is targeting Jamal & Co. that are Bloods.
Unless you don’t consider gang violence as mass shootings.
Whitey typically just starts smoking random people, with the occasional school bully payback shootings.
Aurora is nothing but a gang banger territory now. It was a middle class neighborhood back in the 1980’s. It became a retiree community in the 1990’s, and has since devolved into illegal aliens and lower class neighborhoods.
“The mass murderer was, as typical, white.”
Not if you include all the drive-by shootings and gang related murders. Also, not if you look at percentages. There are twice as many black mass murderers than whites by percentage.
Please read the whole thread first. Been there, done that!
In the strict English-word sense, yes, they are “mass”.
As far as intention, again, they are not. Careless incidental victims or happenstance multiple targets were available.
The list of “mass murders” and “mass shootings” basically never includes the gang-banger fools, because they were not intended to mow down lots of innocent people. (Not because of pro-black covering.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:21st-century_mass_murder_in_the_United_States
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.