Any thing put into a computer is forever.
If this is true it may already meet the standard of NYT v. Sullivan.
That night at 9.32pm Wegman emailed Williamson that the article was ‘superb’ and ‘perfectly tuned’.
He wrote: ‘My anger about US gun culture is so intense that I can’t be calm’.
_—————————————
Ha ha! Too bad, Mr. Wegman. Your irrational anger over an inanimate object and agenda-driven lies are probably going to cost you. Shouldn’t remained calm...or at least sane.
It’s a case that, on its merits, could go either way. But I doubt that a New York jury will side with Palin for the same reason that the Times wrote the article: political bias.
Bennett said: ‘We may have relied too heavily on our earlier editorials and other early coverage of the attack’.
Hoisted by your own petard. Love it.
This is very damning of her. She's guilty for sure. /s
Man, if anyone deserves to win a defamation suit, it’s Governor Palin. Good luck to her.
Somehow I don’t see Palin being vindicated by a NYC jury.
Wonder why venue wasn’t somewhere else, like Alaska.
I hope she takes them for 10 million or so and then runs for Senator in Alaska.
LOL! I looked Gov Palin up just to see what she has been doing lately and found she is divorced.
I told Mr K (not the one on this forum). He sat in contemplation for a moment, then said: “I’m going to have to give her a call, then.”
I answered: “I’ll fight you for her.”