To: Publius; Jacquerie
I like the idea in theory, but demonrats will see this as an existential threat and will sabotage it at all costs in their favor and make things unimaginably worse
4 posted on
01/25/2022 12:06:58 PM PST by
dsrtsage
( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
To: 5thGenTexan; 1010RD; AllAmericanGirl44; Amagi; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Arthur McGowan; ...
8 posted on
01/25/2022 12:09:48 PM PST by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: cotton1706
Must revolution be violent? Must men meet on the battlefield to affect change? Must revolution upend an older society and replace it with a new one? Wouldn’t a 21st century restoration of free American government without resort to violence be revolutionary?
Pennsylvania’s Framer James Wilson thought so:
This revolution principle–that, the sovereign power residing in the people, they may change their constitution and government whenever they please–is not a principle of discord, rancor, or war: it is a principle of melioration, contentment, and peace. It is a principle not recommended merely by a flattering theory: it is a principle recommended by happy experience. To the testimony of Pennsylvania–to the testimony of the United States I appeal for the truth of what I say.Article V and Rational Revolution.
33 posted on
01/25/2022 1:02:34 PM PST by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson