Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC_Conspirator
I’m sure the same 3 will screw the Asians again.

SCOTUS heard pretty much this same issue as recently as 2016. It was 4-3 to uphold this kind of "diversity affirmative action" - only seven votes because Scalia had just died, and Kagan recused.

The Court has changed significantly since then, and there wouldn't be any reason for them to take this case unless they wanted to revisit the 2016 decision. My guess is either 5-4 or 6-3 (Roberts being the swing) to strike it down. The leftie legal pundits already are seeing the writing on the wall.

7 posted on 01/24/2022 8:53:40 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Roberts has been steadfastly opposed to using race in admissions. He voted against it every time it has been before him.


26 posted on 01/24/2022 9:19:01 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

From your keyboard....


37 posted on 01/24/2022 10:03:45 AM PST by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! There)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I hope that’s right, but the flimsier justices could claim “settled law” as an out, and still be welcomed in the DC Cocktail Circuit.

That they took the case is a good sign. Harvard and UNC won, and they and the DOJ did NOT want this in front of SCOTUS, who seem willing to at least consider overturning Fisher.

Personally, I hope it’s 5-4 with Roberts against us, allowing Thomas to write a solid, constitutionally literate ruling that permanently kills racial quotas. If Roberts writes the opinion/ruling, it will be weak and narrow.

Still, not counting my chickens before they hatch.


39 posted on 01/24/2022 10:20:50 AM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
The Court has changed significantly since then, and there wouldn't be any reason for them to take this case unless they wanted to revisit the 2016 decision. My guess is either 5-4 or 6-3 (Roberts being the swing) to strike it down. The leftie legal pundits already are seeing the writing on the wall.

I think the Dems would secretly want it struck down, to motivate the Left to try any and every means to put a Dem majority in power that would change the law in favor of Affirmative action.

54 posted on 01/24/2022 11:42:30 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so stupid people won’t be offended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
there wouldn't be any reason for them to take this case unless they wanted to revisit the 2016 decision.

Excellent observation.

64 posted on 11/01/2022 5:34:09 PM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson