[Savage Rider]

CDC lies.

[DoodleBob]

In this case, they aren't lying. The study and results are pretty clear.

Where does Rand go to prosecute the CDC people who swore there was NO EVIDENCE that natural or acquired immunity provides protection?

[Owen]

Didn’t read the actual report, rather than the article, but prior studies of this did not do a good job of declaring what vaccinated meant.

Meaning, protection 2 weeks after completing vaccination vs those who recovered from a prior infection. Compared to a vaccination 7 months old, vs those with a prior infection.

And the prior infection people also will have that protection age. So . . . I didn’t look at the study, but it will have to address the age of the immunity, or whatever sort, for it to mean anything.

They likely didn’t.