“ It’s an interesting study but I don’t see the reference. Anyone have the publication reference. Which journal and the citation. I would like to read the actual publication.”
Nope, can’t have anything that shatters the bad information you’ve been hawking around here. Oh, you’ll believe Fauci, no matter what he says, but actual people being saved by Ivermectin and you brush it off.
So very thankful I’m not your patient. How many is it that you’ve lost now?
I am happy as well that you are not my patient. As an intensivist it is pretty bad by the time i get them. I have seen a lot of patients and families who tried HCq and ivermectin and ended up in the ICU anyway. I have tried ivermectin in late phase disease. No results.
So when I question a peer reviewed article and ask for its publication source I am genuinely interested in evaluating the study to see if it sways opinion. The fact that this is not punished in any journal of record snd it’s obscure to find means something. The fact that is observational means something.
I am looking for the truth. I am looking for actual studies that show something. I am ever willing to listen. This study as others have pointed it out really doesn’t move the needle all that much
Since the advent and easy distribution of monoclonals we have an excellent survival rate of those who were ok their way to catastrophe. The fact is that monoclonal therapy is superior in ever way to any other therapeutic. This article does nothing to change my position. So i will continue with my current practice of treatment.
The good news of course is that this is over thanks to omicron. I believe I read England is rescinding all Covid measure next weeks. We shouldn’t be far behind.
The other questions tou ask are simply emotional questions that have no bearing on much. They are designed to detract from facts and inculcate emotion which as a debate technique I choose not to take the bait. Raise the vast majority of physicians are salaries so your obtuse money making question is irrelevant.