Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueMondaySkipper

I am happy as well that you are not my patient. As an intensivist it is pretty bad by the time i get them. I have seen a lot of patients and families who tried HCq and ivermectin and ended up in the ICU anyway. I have tried ivermectin in late phase disease. No results.

So when I question a peer reviewed article and ask for its publication source I am genuinely interested in evaluating the study to see if it sways opinion. The fact that this is not punished in any journal of record snd it’s obscure to find means something. The fact that is observational means something.

I am looking for the truth. I am looking for actual studies that show something. I am ever willing to listen. This study as others have pointed it out really doesn’t move the needle all that much

Since the advent and easy distribution of monoclonals we have an excellent survival rate of those who were ok their way to catastrophe. The fact is that monoclonal therapy is superior in ever way to any other therapeutic. This article does nothing to change my position. So i will continue with my current practice of treatment.

The good news of course is that this is over thanks to omicron. I believe I read England is rescinding all Covid measure next weeks. We shouldn’t be far behind.

The other questions tou ask are simply emotional questions that have no bearing on much. They are designed to detract from facts and inculcate emotion which as a debate technique I choose not to take the bait. Raise the vast majority of physicians are salaries so your obtuse money making question is irrelevant.


53 posted on 01/19/2022 8:57:35 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

So you tried Ivermectin late in the cycle with no result. That’s a lie. Everything has a RESULT. Let’s see the specifics, not some drivel. Number of patients, condition prior to starting, dosing regimen, results, results compared to patients not getting ivermectin, etc.. Perhaps you’re not doing it right. If you cared to actually read and comprehend the ivermectin studies, you would find it’s much better to get on the protocol early. Your facility seems intent on letting patients get bad. We know covid deaths are a financial windfall to hospitals.

You don’t mention how many patients you have lost. Tell us. You want us to believe you should be trusted, but to do so we need data. How many covid patients have you lost? What’s the percentage? Same for your facility as a whole. Let’s see the data. Can’t trust you without it. What are you hiding?

Next up, how much COVID based money have you and your facility received? I suspect you have a financial horse in this game and are only here to defend your gravy train. I know of a small town volunteer fire department who raked in $187k for giving jabs and doing tests. Please disclose your financial benefits related to coviD, as well as the same for your employer.

Let’s hear it. Defend your position with real life evidence. How many dead in your facility?


54 posted on 01/20/2022 10:37:51 AM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson