So, I gather that the MSM has taken over clerk duties for the (not so) “wise Latina”.
NO, they did not illustrate why they should stay in their lane; they showed why some should be impeached.
Making false statements in oral argument before the Court is a disciplinary offense and the Fat La Raza should have her ticket pulled. Breyer is just a moron.
This is probably another example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect*.
* https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/dunning-kruger-effect
It seems to me the justices should not be arguing a case before the court. They should shut up and listen.
They just need to stick to the facts presented in the case, not what they hear on CNN.
They are not technical in the scientific or mathematical regard, but I would not want to see a fauci court reserved for technical cases.
Before freaking out entirely, remember that this was just the question/answer session before the case is actually heard, so it does not necessarily mean erroneous “facts” will be the basis of their decision.
But I guess you never know with the agenda justices.
willful ignorance
directed by the deep state
1. The Constitution is old and was relevant for its time. It is no longer relevant.
2. Wise elites must find ways to "work around" the Constitution to obtain the results they desire.
3. Wise elites must shape the public perception in order to get what they desire.
4. Any methods, including lying to the public is acceptable to get the results desired.
5. In order to be a member of the wise elites, one has to be a Progressive.
6. As the Progressives only want to do good, and they must have power to do good, therefore any method to hold onto power is acceptable, so they can do good.
... not ‘wise’ Latina ... WIDE Latina.
It’s irrelevant. The issue is whether OSHA had the legislated authority to impose a vaccine mandate and/or whether it is a “major question” that can never be delegated and must be decided by the legislature and agreed to by the President.
A further question is whether the implementation [e.g. excluding large groups for political reasons] was reasonable in the circumstance where public safety - in the view of OSHA - required universal mandates.
It should be booted on all of the above.
Stay in their lane.
Their ignorance shows that they’re unqualified to be on the court. Three shining examples of liberal morons, propped up, making decisions based on emotion and not having a clue what they’re doing. Especially the Wise Latina and Kagan
Sounds like the Democrats on the court treat the place like a Senate chamber focused on advocacy of legislative policy rather than its legality. Yes, I called them Democrats, and not justices, because, in the end, that is what they are, Just political folks in a room who have law degrees, fully aware of what party appointed them to the court and are either too bored with the law or too ignorant of it {yes, I am speaking of you, Sotomayer) to take time out from their policy advocacy.
I only hope they turn on the tv and see the world mocking them for their frightening ignorance.
But on top of that, the tests couldn’t really diagnose anything—let alone distinguish between Covid, colds and the flu.
I listened to the entire oral argument. Breyer kept repeating 750,000 cases. He said it over and over. It was the only fact at his fingertips. He must have heard it on the morning news, because it was “yesterday’s number.” If I had taken time to prepare a legal brief with facts, I would have been so annoyed that he didn’t even bother to read my report. Just clung to a random number he heard that morning while he was drinking his coffee. He came off like an angry lightweight. All three lib justices did. They gave “facts” from CNN. They discussed policy, not law. It was shocking and frightening to listen to!
Seems crystal clear to any thinking person that libtards do not value competence 🤪
They worship ideology at the expense of common sense.