[Navy Patriot]

Not impressed.

I remember when Roberts rewrote the Unconstitutional Obamacare for the Democrat Congress, when. Ethically, he should have voted it Unconstitutional and sent it back to Congress to write it to conform with the Constitution.

Neither Justices of the Supreme Court, nor Presidents may Constitutionally write Legislation, That is the purview of Congress.

[SaveFerris]

John Roberts, the Obamacare Stooge

[Flick Lives]

The Federal Government; brought to you by Pfizer.

[skeeter]

How often do the judges considered the most “progressive” deviate from their ideology? How often to the judges considered conservative deviate from their’s?

Nuff said.

[elpadre]

ethics involve much more than finances.

[dljordan]

Hey Roberts, want to talk about the Bank of Malta?

[Still Thinking]

Four companies are like half the market. Anybody with a 401k “owns stock” in Netflix and Facebook. Who’s supposed to take cases if those guys are involved? (Course, I own them myself, so this very post is a conflict of interest!)

[Diogenesis]

Is “ethics” the new name for murdering J. Scalia,
visiting Epstein Island, raping children,
and taking Orders from Malta while murdering
Americans waiting for something, anything as
they go to SCOTUS with Evidence of Election Fraud???

[Blue Highway]

Haven’t heard a peep from this guy in ages but now that Ghislaine Maxwell will be doing time he is getting itchy since his name may come up in her little black book of “johns” that frequented Epstein’s Pedo Island.

[Lockbox]

Which Judge or Judges got FIRED? Look at the 1/6/20 “Insurrectionist’s”sentencing the Judge’s statement of “It has to be made clear that trying to violently overthrow the government, trying to stop the peaceful transfer of power, and assaulting law enforcement officers in that effort is going to be met with absolutely certain punishment.”

So how are Judge’s on the take any different?

[Roccus]

“Let me be crystal clear..."

The words of a professional obfuscator.

[neverevergiveup]

The legal ‘profession’ is adrift. It has been for a long time.

[bakeneko]

I’m Chief Justice Roberts, and we take Ethics and stuff seriously. Brought to you by Carl’s Jr.

[pepsi_junkie]

My perception of John Roberts: he's a career washington insider that is totally political but he desperately wants to appear non-political. So he calculatedly makes some ruling in things where it surprises people but then twists his mind into unbelievable pretzel knots to justify positions on others so he can rule in favor of something he politically desires while trying to appear as if he is just following the law (which doesn't work).

In his zeal to trick people into believing that he's not political he actually has become MORE political than he probably was before. Nobody can possible believe at this point that the man rules solely on the basis of the constitution at this point, not since Obamacare and several other eye popping positiobs he's taken.

[Karoo]

So, so much government corruption in the United States

[mass55th]

He did such a great job with the FISA Court didn’t he?

[Jan_Sobieski]

Is he taking his Ethics refresher course on Malta? Who is paying?

[navymom1]

Well, my my my.

[stockpirate]

Roberts is so corrupt it is laughable. Every since he created the path for Obamacare he has been tainted and corrupt with no way for salvation. Which became totally true during the SCOTUS refusing to hear any cases concerning election fraud.

A gallows works for me.

[V K Lee]

“Roberts went on to add that most
judges strictly adhere to the
guidelines laid out and that any
incident where a conflict of
interest was found was likely
“isolated” and “unintentional.””

---

Should this prove true, I’ll eat my hat!

[EastTexasTraveler]

I don’t care to hear about ethics from the guy being blackmailed by the demonrats.