Posted on 12/23/2021 6:43:01 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans
President Trump Supports Vaccine, Doesn’t Support Mandates December 23, 2021 | Sundance | 76 Comments
President Trump gave an interview to Candace Owens for The Daily Wire. The full interview is only available for subscribers [link]; however, there is a segment released by Mrs. Owens where Donald Trump talks about the specifics of his position on the vaccine and the mandates.
President Trump supports the three vaccines that were developed during his administration, and is proud of the system he put into place to develop them and get them available to the public. However, President Trump does not support mandating the vaccine or forced vaccination for anyone, and believes that people should have the freedom to decide what is in their individual best interests. WATCH:
https://youtu.be/7vhcaxYTro4
At approximately 05:10 of the interview, President Trump notes the specific issue of a government mandated vaccine developed by a private corporation, and the risk of corruption and conflicted interests involved. President Trump accepts that reasonable people would be skeptical of the vaccine itself and would have personal reasons not to participate.
Toward the very end of the interview Trump states he is proud of the accomplishment and will not “give up” on his belief of the vaccine development as a success during his administration. However, he sees the forced mandate as very detrimental to the economy and views the consequences of the mandate itself as a problem for national security.
Given the range of opinions on the issue of the vaccines overall, and the mandate specifically, President Trump’s position seems quite pragmatic and reasonable. He’s proud to have developed the vaccines, believes they are of benefit, but strongly respects individual choice, liberty and the freedom to decide for yourself and your family. I don’t see anything controversial in this position.
Okay then, where is Trump on all these mandate-type developments? He’s been silent about it for the most part.
Police State: New Hampshire Fights To Remove Children After Parents Treated Them With Ivermectin
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4024025/posts
*** Sorry, but I cannot find your QUOTED words.
I did find this:
Trump had tweeted “Be there, will be wild.” ***
It didn’t see the tweet. I heard it on air, and when I heard it, I thought, “What the f*** is he thinking?”
It was only 20-25% dying before birth two years ago.
>>> Without the vaccines, via Operation Warp Speed, a quarter of the country would be DEAD.
From a virus with 99.9% survival rate???
you need to re-do your math and stop listening to cable news.
I don’t watch cable news and you’re completely missing the point, like 99% of everyone here and the conservative base freaking out over Trump’s support of the vaccines.
I don’t know you. Why should I trust you, or care if you trust me. Trump was the driving force behind the vaccines. It was hailed as a crowning triumph at the time. Now he’s supposed to just recant his support of his vaccines, just so you would trust him? The vaccines are somewhat disappointing, not at all the panacea that Biden and Fauci claims they are. But they are not a deadly poison, either. If they were, after three jabs my wife and I would already be dead. My son is having his third jab tomorrow. It’s unlikely that he’ll suffer any adverse effects. They do happen, and more often than one would like and more often than most vaccines, for that matter, but most people do not suffer any adverse reaction. You want to say you no longer trust Trump because he stands by his vaccines? Have fun with that. Let me know how it works out.
>>> I don’t watch cable news and you’re completely missing the point, like 99% of everyone here and the conservative base freaking out over Trump’s support of the vaccines.
You mean this point from the opening post?
” He’s proud to have developed the vaccines, believes they are of benefit, but strongly respects individual choice, liberty and the freedom to decide for yourself and your family. I don’t see anything controversial in this position.”
No... I have NOT missed the point.
I just strongly disagree with it.
The “Point” can only be argued to be true if it can be shown that the vaccines are of ANY benefit.
They are not. They are designed to kill... not to save.
Only time will prove that out.
You disagree with Trump letting people make up their own minds instead of implementing mandates?
You have any idea how many would have died without OWS?
>>> You disagree with Trump letting people make up their own minds instead of implementing mandates?
Trump is not “Letting” ANYBODY do ANYTHING. He has no authority at this point one way or the other.
This is what your question sounds like with a slight alteration:
“Do YOU disagree with ME letting YOU decide whether or not to drink gasoline”???
Silly question right? Why? because i can’t make you drink gasoline, or because it would be STUPID to drink gasoline?
This brings us to your second question:
>>> You have any idea how many would have died without OWS?
Now... I don’t know what OWS is, but I assume because of our topic here it is a reference to the MRNA injections being sold to us as “vaccines”.
My answer to you is this...
Yes... less than 1% of everyone who gets Covid.
As it turns out, the death rate from COVID 19 is almost identical to the common flu. (which apparently was completely eradicated in 2020... Imagine that!)
WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO about the lethality of this man made Corona Virus.
Trump has now POSITIONED HIMSELF WITH THE LIARS!!!
That is a simple fact.
You don’t get it!!!
I’d destroy your argument but I’m currently inebriated at the bar watching the Packers. LOL
>>> I’d destroy your argument but I’m currently inebriated at the bar watching the Packers. LOL
That would explain your silly question.
Why don’t you just tell me the point that I don’t get.
Nah, I’ll just concede that you’re an idiot and call it a day.
>>> Nah, I’ll just concede that you’re an idiot and call it a day.
yeah... that’s about all you have left to do.
hurl insults because you cannot even make a point.
Hey.... Merry Christmas.
When seatbelts are viewed as a good thing that is necessary to save lives, seatbelts are mandated. The first thing invariably leads to the second thing.
should be:
When seatbelts are viewed as a good thing that is necessary to save lives, seatbelts are mandated. The first thing invariably leads to the second thing.
Banning abortion is necessary to save lives, but currently, a lot of people are unwilling to view banning abortion as necessary to save lives.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
(or FR typo police!)
Virtually every tyranny operates with the claim that is is acting in the best interests of the majority of the people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.