Posted on 12/20/2021 6:08:40 PM PST by Entrepreneur
Now, the Fauci Emails reveal that Dr Anthony Fauci was the one who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study. We also know the article was pulled back after members of the medical community launched a campaign to withdraw that study, which no doubt included Dr. Fauci himself!
(Excerpt) Read more at civilianintelligencenetwork.ca ...
The guy who got the Nobel for HIV - after Faurci tried to steal it from him - has spoken out. He said he had he had nothing to lose and couldn't be forced to retract anything.
The virologists from India were forced to withdraw their article. Fauci coudn't force a Nobel prize winner retract anything.
The inventors (fauci et al) are listed and the government is the assignee. not sure how that works out.
Don't worry. The important stuff is no way in the tax records.
According to Robert Kennedy Jr., he stands to make a lot, as do his handpicked underlings.
Covid -19 is not HIV. In the very early days of the pandemic, a group of very well regarded researchers in India sequenced a sample of Covid-19 and discovered sequence that appeared to be inserted that was unique and from the HIV virus. There are a series of papers from research funded by Fauci that identify the HIV sequence that allows the virus to hide from the immune system. There is speculation that this sequence or a similar one was inserted into Covid-19 to allow it to defeat the immune system. Recent research shows that Covid-19 has a unique, never before seen in corona virus, ability to allow it to hide from the immune system for a period of time to allow it replicate to critical mass for infection before the body recognizes it and mounts an immune response. This ability of the covid virus to delay identification by the immune system for a critical replication time window is a big art off it’s infectiousness and transmissability
Very few people here provide identifying information.
If you find my COVID information useful, I’m happy. If you don’t, you have to do what you think is best for yourself and your family.
There’ no doubt this virus was created in a lab, and we helped finance it. The media refuses to broach this subject. Ask yourself why.
Just wait until he starts suing everyone replicating the virus in their own bodies for patent infringement...
I have no doubt that someone who championed GoF research may well have some level involvement in the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It appears to me it *was* lab created, and someday (surely? I hope?), the truth will out.
There have been previous claims that “Covid is AIDS” here on FR, and some posters here even insisted it “gives you malaria” because of little snippets of code that match up with malaria (and Heaven knows what else — pomegranates, maybe). There has been a lot of crazy on both sides of the Covid divide.
I am not surprised Fauci has been involved in dengue and Ebola research.
If I’m not mistaken, gp120 is also found in the zika virus. Not sure. There has been research on developing an mRNA zika vaccine that may involve gp120:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02464/full
The dengue vaccine study you referenced is attenuated virus, not mRNA, but I would not be at all surprised if similar mRNA vaccines for dengue are in development, and maybe even for ebola.
If you said this is where we would be at two years ago, I would never have believed it.
But at this point, if you told me you saw a flying saucer hovering above the White House then a laser of white light beamed down on the front lawn and a giant cockroach materialized then zipped himself into a Joe Biden suit and walked in the front doorâ¦â¦â¦â¦
Wellâ¦.. ok⦠thatâÂÂs on the table.
What color were the lights on the saucer?
Fair enough. But you are (or claim to be) in a profession that is built on evidence of credentials. If you want to remain anonymous, fine. But you can’t have it both ways, can you? Are individuals allowed to practice medicine without displaying their licenses and certifications?
Likewise declaring medical authority without publishing evidence of that authority is quackery.
So, a until proven otherwise, your COVID information is no better than anyone else’s.
I provide information for your consideration.
What you do with it is up to you, as it should be.
SARS-Cov-2 is not HIV.
Just because Fauci is listed as an inventor on some patents doesn’t mean squat. What matters is the assignee, which in this instance is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The assignee is the entity with legal ownership rights. I am an inventor on a few patents assigned to one of the largest companies in the world (by market capitalization) and I have never made single dime from any of it.
SAVE
Have you read Kennedy’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci” yet?
If you haven’t, don’t dismiss this as not plausible.
I’m only part way through and if only a fraction of what he accuses Fauci of is true, Fauci and many others still would deserve to burn in hell for eternity for what they have done.
“Well, I have treated more than a thousand patients with HIV and lots and lots of COVID patients since March 2020.”
May I ask a question? Because, many people have tested positive for HIV (the virus), but never develop AIDS (the disease), is it also true that many people test positive for SARS-COV2 but never develop Covid? If so, what does that say about the numbers? We are always told X number of people have tested Positive for “Covid” when they have actually tested positive for the virus, not the disease. This is a serious, even if a silly, question. I have been confused about this since the beginning.
The article says that the Covid, is HIV 2.0. A virus that has similar abilities to mess with the immune system, and purposely created to do so using building blocks of the OG.
In my mind, that is not saying it is HIV, but a purposeful spin off.
This is from back in May, but makes a compelling overall case for lab origin:
https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/
Yes, from a publication regularly thought of as “liberal”, to boot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.