Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

How is that relevant to the vulnerable population? The global population is not vulnerable. Only the older global population is.

That’s not hard information to find. Why didn’t you?


20 posted on 12/19/2021 9:00:11 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Owen
— “That's not hard information to find. Why didn't you?”

Tell you what. You cite some sources, and we'll read them together?

Merely discarding mine is mere assertion.

You write, “The global population is not vulnerable.” Given the breakthrough news, the assertions that 5 year olds are transmitters of the virus, and more, what is “vulnerable?”

Given that China — according to my cited sources — is calculated to have deaths of about 0.0033 % of the population over almost two years, it would be lovely for you to cite your source(s).

By citing sources, we can evaluate for ourselves as for those who follow these threads as to our biases and methodologies.

21 posted on 12/19/2021 9:09:35 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson