Tell you what. You cite some sources, and we'll read them together?
Merely discarding mine is mere assertion.
You write, “The global population is not vulnerable.” Given the breakthrough news, the assertions that 5 year olds are transmitters of the virus, and more, what is “vulnerable?”
Given that China — according to my cited sources — is calculated to have deaths of about 0.0033 % of the population over almost two years, it would be lovely for you to cite your source(s).
By citing sources, we can evaluate for ourselves as for those who follow these threads as to our biases and methodologies.
Tell you what. Why don’t you explain why you don’t limit your denominator to the age group that dies? Explain why you do that according to all sources over 2 years and we can let people evaluate your methodological purity.
Why are you talking about 5 yr old transmitters after you just quoted your bizarre death stats including in them people who don’t generally die. Pregnancy rates among men are low, so lets include men in the calculation of population pregnancy rates? How can you not see your bias?