Posted on 12/13/2021 10:55:55 AM PST by rellimpank
Will this Law allow us to SUE the State and Public Employee’s for Approving the Sale of these weapons??
—sorry-—correct link-
Start with: “The Right to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be Infringed.”
Civil suits used as Newsom proposes are clearly intended to infringe. Newsom’s own comments can be used in court to prove the purpose was to circumvent the 2nd A. The test case will just be a waste of resources, with the Defendant winning court costs and attorneys’ fees.
Indeed they are. Just as the Texas law promoting civil suits against abortion providers are clearly intended to infringe.
Newsom’s own comments can be used in court to prove the purpose was to circumvent the 2nd A.
And the Texas law is clearly intended to circumvent Roe v. Wade.
The test case will just be a waste of resources, with the Defendant winning court costs and attorneys’ fees.
Depends. I know Texas is a loser-pays state but I don't know if California is. Regardless, I fully expect any suits filed under the Newsom law to meet the same fate as any suits filed under the Texas law - dismissed due to lack of standing.
I don’t disagree with your points.
Though I view Roe as an important ruling limiting government power over individuals, and an affirmation of the Constitution intended by the Founders, it is a complex judicial interpretation built upon the 10th Amendment distributed via the 14th, and iteration of an “implied” right. It is subject to judicial re-interpretation. Not really on equal footing with a direct Constitutional Amendment.
Stop spouting about stuff you obviously know nothing about. They’re not illegal. You have to pay the Federal tax.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.