Posted on 12/12/2021 2:37:23 AM PST by Kaslin
The people who should be protecting us should be the NIH/ FDA/CDC and they are ethically, morally, and legally charged with that duty.
However, the vaccine is co-owned by NIH. How is this not a conflict of interest ?
"You have to look for it .. in order to find it" - that's called research ,
and to the best of my knowledge, they aren't even actively looking into this research .
VAERS is an itemized notation of vaccine side-effects operated by the CDC, but hasn't been updated ; anywhere else, that's called "dereliction of duty".
They aren't lying in their minds. The science keeps changing and vaccination status is a work in progress /s
What would I say if you did ANYTHING to yourself that you wanted to, or even had a physician's approval?
You mean like a Rachel Levine? Or full body tattoos including irises? Or an abortion, if that were apt? Or being blinded because you always wanted to be blind? (All examples from real life.)
Well, you are free as best I see it to do as you wish, as long as you don't hand me your bill for the consequences.
Please excuse my obtuseness, but the strange question arose in my mind- since the last “wild” case was in 1977, and smallpox was declared non-existant in 1980, can anyone explain to me why 37000 people were vaccinated (US) for smallpox in 2003?
And yet there are many articles that show a preponderance of vaccinated getting sick/hospitalized/dead.
It seems like when they achieved their goal of massive testing with a faulty test, they stopped keeping track of anything but numbers of “cases” and “covid deaths” - and refused to fully document/post vaccine deaths and problems.
Not to mention false stories about the same stats in the US of A.
Why do we not see regular and in-depth updates on many factors and stats that give us a clear picture?
Have you seen the stories about a college with nearly 100% vaccinated populace having the magically reappeared Flu running through it - or the college with 100% claimed vaccinated with over 50 case of covid?
Exactly - and they tell us, “We know the jabs are working” without ever telling us how they know.
Not to mention they never advertise their actual products like they do other drugs - ostensibly because if they did, they’d have to list the potential side effects. So they just say - “Get jabbed - it’s safe and effective”.
I don't think most of the MSM is slightly interested in providing the messy details about Covid. The pros and cons of treatments and vaccinations don't easily fit into 30 second sound bites. 90% of the media are democrats, so they will push democratic talking points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.