Posted on 12/11/2021 7:24:11 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Hahahaha
But you seem to be fine with forcing untested “vaccines” on the global population and getting your testing data from that.
Do you object to forcing untested “vaccines” onto the global population?
You are reading into my words what is not there. Just because I have an inherent distrust of VAERS figures (because I have not verified them) does not mean that I accept mandates for the injection of a synthetic substance. Good grief.
You don’t accept VAERS data, which is the only data the feral government has deigned to provide.
All you have is religious faith in Tony Fauci.
I distrust Fauci more than I distrust what is reported through/of VAERS. You seem to accept VAERS without question. What else do you accept without question? Why?
You’re getting sensitive in your old age, moje.
I think VAERS is vastly under-reported.
https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/underreporting-vaccine-adverse-events
I think a deliberate global genocide is being committed and people will be debilitated and dying for years to come.
Why aren’t the illegal aliens streaming over the southern border required to get a “vaccine?”
It’s because they are our replacements.
And useful idiots like you are helping it come about.
We’re both on the same page. You’re just more gullible.
Hope you have a large stock of storable food because we are headed the way of Venezuela thanks to Fauci/China biological warfare virus hypochondriacs and Fauci/China biological warfare vaccine groupies like you.
I agree with you. They know there are way too many adverse events but they want to continue injecting a toxic experimental drug into all including children. That is NOT Science and that is NOT normal.
Maybe I just recognize the existential threat we are facing and you are just too smug and narcissistic to do anything other than virtue-signal about how intelligent you believe yourself to be.
Maybe.
High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease.
Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases.
Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [[1]]. In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older [[2]]. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission.
A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) [[3]]. One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more.
In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]].
The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties [[5]].
Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.
~~~~~~
More at the link
~Easy
Heard in the corridors of CDC:
“Six million or it never happened.....”
:-(
Damning’ Ivermectin Tape Exposes Pressure by Big Pharma to Suppress Ivermectin, RFK, Jr.’s New Book Reveals
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s new book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” includes a revealing transcript — printed here — of a conversation withDr. Andrew Hill, who admitted to caving to pressure to downplay the benefits of ivermectin as a COVID treatment.
By Neville Hodgkinson
Excerpts:
Dr. Andrew Hill, author of a favorable analysis of ivermectin studies.
He had subsequently performed a “neck-wrenching” U-turn on the issue, claiming the studies comprised “low certainty” of value and that more trials were needed.
Lawrie was trying to persuade Hill to participate in and co-author an immediate review of all published ivermectin studies in the medical literature, to be conducted by the eminent Cochrane Network, which uses thousands of volunteers to make high-quality, independent treatment recommendations.
“It was an exciting opportunity,” Kennedy writes. “Under normal circumstances, Hill should have pounced on this chance to serve as lead author with some of the world’s most prestigious researchers. He was nevertheless noncommittal.
The article states that Lawrie spoke to Hill by Zoom and the call was recorded.
“Dr Lawrie asked Hill to explain his U-turn on ivermectin, which his own analysis found overwhelmingly effective. ‘How can you do this?’ she inquired politely. ‘You are causing irreparable harm.’Hill explained that he was in a ‘tricky situation’ because his sponsors had put pressure on him.
Hill is a University of Liverpool virologist who serves as an adviser to Bill Gates and the Clinton Foundation. He told me his sponsor was Unitaid.
“Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries — France, the United Kingdom, Norway, Brazil, Spain, the Republic of Korea and Chile — to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals for distribution to the African poor.
“Its primary purpose seems to be protecting the patent and intellectual property rights of pharmaceutical companies — which, as we shall see, is the priority passion for Bill Gates — and to ensure their prompt and full payment.About 63 percent of its funding comes from a surtax on airline tickets.
“The BMGF holds a board seat and chairs Unitaid’s Executive Committee, and the BMGF has given Unitaid $150 million since 2005. Various Gates-funded surrogate and front organizations also contribute, as does the pharmaceutical industry.
“The BMGF and Gates personally own large stakes in many of the pharmaceutical companies that profit from this boondoggle. Gates also uses Unitaid to fund corrupt science by tame and compromised researchers like Hill that legitimizes his policy directives to the WHO.
“Unitaid gave $40 million to Andrew Hill’s employer, the University of Liverpool, four days before the publication of Hill’s study. Hill, a Ph.D., confessed that the sponsors were pressuring him to influence his conclusion.
When Dr. Lawrie asked who was trying to influence him, Hill said, ‘I mean, I, I think I’m in a very sensitive position here …’”
Please take the time to read the article in the top link. You won’t regret it. It’s all right there. Conflicts of interest and researchers cow-towing to ‘the powers that be.’ In this case everyone’s genuflecting to Unitaid.
Best quote:
“Yeah. Well, I don’t know how you sleep at night, honestly.” – Dr. Tess Lawrie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.