Posted on 12/11/2021 7:24:11 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Its against the law to report fake deaths or symptoms. Seems only now the website is being questioned. Weird.
Heart damage does not go away.
“For a illness that has a 99.87% survivability rate?”
Don’t bother throwing that stat to entropy. I’ve mentioned that to him before. Yet he still thinks 99% safe is better than 99.87% safe. (There is none so blind as those who will not see.)
I’ll wait for you to post your proof everyone got the shot and not the saline shot. I seem to recall some were “accidentally” getting the fake shot
"Pretty safe?"
That doesn't sound very scientific.
Do you have any long-term double-blind studies, the gold standard of scientific studies?
Or just VAERS-like stuff?
That's a lie.
You can have long-term double-blind studies, but you don't have them so you lie.
I found your diagnoses. It all makes sense now
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/12/10/mass-formation-psychosis/
Every submission includes multiple sworn declarations. If people are lying it could be found out and they could be charged with perjury under US Federal law.
They are not anonymous submissions. Also, it is not easy to fill out the forms. It takes 30+ minutes and you need batch numbers, dates, places, names, etc. Hard to fake.
The system is designed to discourage reporting. That is how Big Pharma and Big Medicine like it. Otherwise, their $$$ lobbyists would get it changed to be easier and more effective.
What do you mean "other than those with sudden death from myocarditis"?
I'm not aware of any of them linked to vaccination.
📌
No, because there hasn't been enough time.
What I do have is billions of shots with no evidence of increased death from the vaccine.
More importantly, I have millions of people dead from Covid so the decision's pretty eady.
Heart issues in younger people...including deaths....you asked...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4011041/posts
Sadly, they happen. But not all heart issues are myocarditis. Do you have any evidence of deaths from myocarditis following a vaccination, which was the claim?
The list has grown: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3988541/posts?page=266#266
VAERS did their own analysis about 10 years ago and found, “Fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”
20,000 / 0.01 = 2,000,000.
(2,000,000 / 234,269,053) * 100 = 0.854%.
Probability of not dying from the Covid-19 vaccines: 99.146%
Probability of not dying from Covid-19 infection (age 50-69): 99.5%.
If the vaccines work, why aren’t they working?
Believe me, my level of skepticism is at its highest with people like Fauci. Subsequent comments have made an effort to substantiate the process whereby VAERS figures are established.
To submit a VAERS report involves a lengthy process subject to careful scrutiny. To report VAERS numbers these days is to parrot them without said scrutiny.
Off by 7 seconds in the way of time. Off by a mile in the way of assessing my stance on the matter. My intent is to invite substantiation, not dismiss the numbers out of hand.
they have been manipulated
downwards, greatly
we already know by many folks who have studied the vaers reporting system that the underreporting is, depending on which one you look at off by a factor of ten, to a factor of 100.
puts that 20,000 death figure in a different perspective...
Does your umbilical have an ethernet connection so you can verify who is running the VAERS website in such a manner that you willfully, easily, and immediately accede intellectually to its content? Have you viewed the original documents represented therein and personally interviewed the parties who submitted them? I didn’t think so.
You be the parrot. I’ll be the skeptic, although I suspect the synthetic injections to be more injurious than not.
Unless we investigate thoroughly for ourselves, how do we know? “It’s on the internet!” The amount of deception available through internet and broadcast media has reached a level of serious incredulity on all fronts. “Trust but verify” is a judicious turn of phrase, but verification does not come by accepting every positive statement made. Is the rabbit hole worth the price?
How long would it take to investigate five VAERS cases as represented by their website, includings hands-on access to the documents and face-to-face interviews with the individual(s) involved? Weeks? Months?Easier and cheaper just to say “Okay.” At that point, however, any pronouncements may be considered suspect.
Manipulation is easy. Truth is not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.