Why does Pfizer want its vaccine research protected? The number of unknowns about the vaccine creates suspicion. We have no way to calculate with any confidence long- and short-term risks

American Thinker ^ | 12/10/2021 | Matt Rowe

[SeekAndFind]

Go look at the VAERS COVID Vaccine Mortality Report to know why Pfizer wants FDA protection for its vaccine research along with 75 years of document secrecy. While there are all sorts of ways to interpret the VAERS data, and it's entirely possible that the vaccine is safer than COVID, not only have many people probably died from the vaccine, but there's also still no way of knowing what the vaccine's long-term effects are.

Some experts have calculated that only about 1% of adverse reactions are ever reported for various reasons in the U.S. This could be due to minor symptoms, unfelt symptoms, or the amount of time and bureaucracy a doctor must go through to make a report.

Some reasonable conservative estimates are that deaths due to the COVID vaccine in the U.S. are around 140,000. Keep in mind that this analysis does not distinguish the factor that deaths are much more highly likely to be reported in VAERS than more minor symptoms.

If you assume that 80% of deaths are reported (80/20 rule) and that VAERS reports 19,552 deaths, then the number of COVID deaths due to vaccines is much more likely around 24,440 between 2020 and 2021. The number of adverse deaths per prior years was about 400, or something over 5,200 deaths during the previous 30 years. At first look, these numbers are startling.

[EEGator]

Get the shot or get fired and can’t travel.
Hide the data of said shot.
Seems reasonable...

[SaveFerris]

Don’t ask questions, citizen.

Just line up for the 4th jab.

💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉

[SaveFerris]

(Get the shot or get fired and can’t travel)

A precursor to “no man can buy or sell” (eventually)

And nowhere to escape this tyranny

[EEGator]

That’s when we go “Road Warrior/Mad Max” style...

[Gaffer]

They want to protect that fantastic FULL IMMUNITY deal they got from the government lest complete voter outrage arise and force government to retract it and subject them to massive lawsuits.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

Given that the public via government through “warp speed” helped sponsor this whole “event” and the resulting “products,” any argument that the public should be kept uninformed about their investment is suspicious at the outset.

[Paul46360]

[ThunderSleeps]

...there's also still no way of knowing what the vaccine's long-term effects are.

Come on, the FDA looked at about 4 months worth of data from a trial group that represented roughly 0.009% of the US population. What could go wrong in 3 to 5 years from giving that to 200+ million people? :-/

[Harpotoo]

It’s like Fingers saying everything should be Electric by 2050. They’ll all be dead by then and living the la vida loca till them on their sure to win stock holdings until then.

[9YearLurker]

It’s even worse than that. The jab manufacturers based their approvals on 2 to 4 weeks of data, depending upon which put their shady study results in the best light. Then they disbanded those studies early, claiming that it would be unethical not to make the jabs available to the control group—at the same time that they were jabbing some Americans with control sort-of placebos at the same time.

[Jan_Sobieski]

Noble Lie